一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法

李春光; 王霈显; 郜海民; 丁美宙; 熊安言; 王二彬; 文秋成; 鲍文华

doi:10.12187/2020.04.005

CN 41-1437/TS ISSN 2096-1553

一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法

李春光 , 王霈显 , 郜海民 , 丁美宙 , 熊安言 , 王二彬 , 文秋成 , 鲍文华

李春光, 王霈显, 郜海民, 等. 一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

引用本文: 李春光, 王霈显, 郜海民, 等. 一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

LI Chunguang, WANG Peixian, GAO Haimin, et al. A new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

Citation: LI Chunguang, WANG Peixian, GAO Haimin, et al. A new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法

1. 河南中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心, 河南郑州 450000;
2. 河南中烟工业有限责任公司黄金叶生产制造中心, 河南郑州 450000

作者简介: 李春光(1976-),男,河南省郑州市人,河南中烟工业有限责任公司高级工程师,主要研究方向为烟草工程.;

基金项目: 河南中烟工业有限责任公司研究项目（ZW201802）
中图分类号: TS432

A new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality

1. Technology Center, China Tobacco He'nan Industrial Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, China;
2. Gold Leaf Manufacturing Center, China Tobacco He'nan Industrial Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, China
Received Date: 2019-11-29

CLC number: TS432

摘要: 针对现有卷烟感官品质评价方式的评价结果差异不明显和变化趋势不明确的问题，建立了一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法：采用专家咨询法并结合实际评吸经验，根据消费者的关注程度对优雅度、满足感、舒适感和轻松感各感官品质评价指标赋予权重，利用数理统计方法对各评吸人员的评价结果进行计算，得出卷烟各感官品质评价指标小项和总体得分，并根据各项得分判定实验样品间感官品质差异程度和变化方向.可行性验证结果表明：该方法即使在感官品质变化较小时，也能够较好地从分值上进行区分；其既能反映整体感官品质的差异程度，又能反映总体或单个感官品质评价指标的变化趋势，且感官品质差异性的区分度也较明显，可应用于卷烟制品的研发和品质控制.
- 卷烟制品 /
- 感官品质 /
- 对比评价 /
- 评价指标 /
- 评价方法
Abstract: Aiming at the problems that the evaluation results of the existing cigarette sensory quality evaluation methods were not obvious and the change trend was not clear,a new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality was established. The specific process was as follows:using the expert consultation method and combining with the actual evaluation experience,according to the degree of consumer concern,each sensory quality evaluating indicator of elegance,satisfaction,comfort and ease was given weight. The evaluation results of each smoking evaluation person were calculated by mathematical statistics method,and the sub items and overall scores of each sensory quality evaluating indicator were obtained. According to the scores,the difference degree and change direction of sensory quality were determined. The feasibility verification results showed that the method could distinguish the sensory quality from the score when the change of sensory quality was small. It could not only reflect the difference degree of the overall sensory quality,but also reflect the change trend of the overall and individual sensory quality evaluation indicators,and the differentiation of sensory quality differences was obvious. This method could be applied to the development and quality control of cigarette products.
- cigarette product /
- sensory quality /
- comparative evaluation /
- evaluating indicator /
- evaluation method
1. [1]
  国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品感官评价方法:YC/T 138-1998[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1998.
2. [2]
  国家烟草专卖局.烟草在制品感官评价方法:YC/T 415-2011[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
3. [3]
  云南中烟工业有限责任公司.一种卷烟感官品质的星形图识别法:201510825476.3[P].2016-04-20.
4. [4]
  乔学义,王兵,马宇平,等.烤烟烟叶质量风格特色感官评价方法的建立与应用[J].烟草科技,2014(9):5.
5. [5]
  武怡,杨乾栩,王猛,等.脸谱法在卷烟风格特征中的应用[J].烟草科技,2019,52(11):96.
6. [6]
  浙江中烟工业有限责任公司.一种优化卷烟感官评价的分析方法:201710514788.1[P].2017-09-08.
7. [7]
  国家烟草专卖局.基于消费体验的中式卷烟感官评价方法:YC/T 564-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
8. [8]
  申玉军,邓国栋,陈良元,等.一种烟草感官评价分析方法的建立及应用[J].烟草科技,2011(5):15.
9. [9]
  秦前浩.卷烟工艺测试与分析大纲[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2004.
10. [10]
  侯定丕.层次分析[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1990.
11. [11]
  赵松山,白雪梅.用德尔菲法确定权数的改进方法[J].统计研究,1994(4):46.
12. [12]
  中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.卷烟第4部分:感官技术要求:GB 5606.4-2005[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005.
13. [13]
  中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.烟草及烟草制品调节和测试的大气环境:GB/T 16447-2004[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
14. [14]
  国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品建立感官分析实验室的一般导则:YC/T 565-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
15. [15]
  李忠范,高文森,杨荣,等.应用数理统计[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009.
1. [1]
  方亦成 , 杨菁 , 陆诚玮 , 冯奇 , 汪旭 . 基于层次分析法的加热卷烟感官评价指标筛选及其权重建立. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(2): 107-113. doi: 10.12187/2024.02.014
2. [2]
  王小媛 , 耿君君 , 靳学远 , 牛涵 , 王龙霞 . 基于不同杀菌方式的杜仲籽油-苹果汁复合饮料贮藏稳定性评价. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(2): 1-11. doi: 10.12187/2024.02.001
3. [3]
  郭华诚 , 胡仙妹 , 高尊华 , 李金周 , 王红霞 . 针辊式烟丝结构调控设备参数变化对细支烟卷制品质的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(2): 122-126. doi: 10.12187/2024.02.016
4. [4]
  苑彬 , 金慧 , 骈琳 , 高思今 , 黄泽华 . 美拉德反应对食品品质与安全的影响及其产物检测研究进展. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(2): 60-68. doi: 10.12187/2024.02.008
5. [5]
  杜赫 , 杨洪峰 , 吴爽爽 , 赵怡凡 , 董露 , 田野 , 王志刚 , 陈晨 . 卷烟降焦减害滤棒构件的制备及应用. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(2): 94-99,121. doi: 10.12187/2024.02.012
6. [6]
  田金虎 , 袁颖 , 卢昕博 , 汤晓东 , 潘力 , 王雨凝 , 叶兴乾 , 蒋健 . 微波预处理对加热卷烟用烤烟烟叶常规化学成分及挥发性香气成分的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(2): 69-79. doi: 10.12187/2024.02.009

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 32
文章访问数: 2048
引证文献数: 0

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

李春光, 王霈显, 郜海民, 等. 一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

引用本文: 李春光, 王霈显, 郜海民, 等. 一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

LI Chunguang, WANG Peixian, GAO Haimin, et al. A new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2020, 35(4): 34-39. doi: 10.12187/2020.04.005

一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法

作者简介:李春光(1976-),男,河南省郑州市人,河南中烟工业有限责任公司高级工程师,主要研究方向为烟草工程.

1. 河南中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心, 河南郑州 450000;
2. 河南中烟工业有限责任公司黄金叶生产制造中心, 河南郑州 450000

收稿日期: 2019-11-29

基金项目: 河南中烟工业有限责任公司研究项目（ZW201802）

关键词:

摘要: 针对现有卷烟感官品质评价方式的评价结果差异不明显和变化趋势不明确的问题，建立了一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法：采用专家咨询法并结合实际评吸经验，根据消费者的关注程度对优雅度、满足感、舒适感和轻松感各感官品质评价指标赋予权重，利用数理统计方法对各评吸人员的评价结果进行计算，得出卷烟各感官品质评价指标小项和总体得分，并根据各项得分判定实验样品间感官品质差异程度和变化方向.可行性验证结果表明：该方法即使在感官品质变化较小时，也能够较好地从分值上进行区分；其既能反映整体感官品质的差异程度，又能反映总体或单个感官品质评价指标的变化趋势，且感官品质差异性的区分度也较明显，可应用于卷烟制品的研发和品质控制.

English Abstract

A new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality

1. Technology Center, China Tobacco He'nan Industrial Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, China;
2. Gold Leaf Manufacturing Center, China Tobacco He'nan Industrial Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, China

Received Date: 2019-11-29

Abstract: Aiming at the problems that the evaluation results of the existing cigarette sensory quality evaluation methods were not obvious and the change trend was not clear,a new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality was established. The specific process was as follows:using the expert consultation method and combining with the actual evaluation experience,according to the degree of consumer concern,each sensory quality evaluating indicator of elegance,satisfaction,comfort and ease was given weight. The evaluation results of each smoking evaluation person were calculated by mathematical statistics method,and the sub items and overall scores of each sensory quality evaluating indicator were obtained. According to the scores,the difference degree and change direction of sensory quality were determined. The feasibility verification results showed that the method could distinguish the sensory quality from the score when the change of sensory quality was small. It could not only reflect the difference degree of the overall sensory quality,but also reflect the change trend of the overall and individual sensory quality evaluation indicators,and the differentiation of sensory quality differences was obvious. This method could be applied to the development and quality control of cigarette products.

参考文献 (15) 相关文章 (6)