JOURNAL OF LIGHT INDUSTRY

CN 41-1437/TS  ISSN 2096-1553

Volume 38 Issue 4
August 2023
Article Contents
HU Xianmei, ZHANG Chen, YANG Xuepeng, et al. Effects of different drying methods on structure and volatile components of tobacco bacterial cellulose[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 77-83. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.010
Citation: HU Xianmei, ZHANG Chen, YANG Xuepeng, et al. Effects of different drying methods on structure and volatile components of tobacco bacterial cellulose[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 77-83. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.010 shu

Effects of different drying methods on structure and volatile components of tobacco bacterial cellulose

  • Received Date: 2022-07-26
    Accepted Date: 2022-09-16
  • With prepared from tobacco waste as material, natural drying (NAD), hot air drying (HAD), vacuum freeze drying (VFD), -20℃ pre-freeze-vacuum freeze drying (VFD-20), -80℃ pre-freeze-vacuum freeze drying (VFD-80) and liquid nitrogen pre-freeze-vacuum freeze drying (VFD-FLN) were adopted to dry BC pellicles. The physical properties of dried BC pellicles were analyzed by colorimeter, FESEM and thermogravimetry. Then the aroma components of BC were analyzed by simultaneous distillation-extraction and GC-MS. The results showed that VFD-FLN could keep the fiber length on the basis of the original three-dimensional reticular structure of BC. VFD, VFD-20 and VFD-80 kept the three-dimensional spatial structure of BC better, but the fiber length became shorter. NAD and HAD destroyed the spatial structure, resulting in the lowest rehydration rate and swelling rate. The color retention of BC treated by NAD was the best, and the volatile aroma components of BC were mainly acidic substances, the relative content of which was 97.93%. The content of aroma components after VFD was only second to NAD. The aroma components mainly included carotenoid degradation products, terpene degradation products and phenylalanine degradation products. The drying speed of HAD was the fastest, but the content of aroma components was the least.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      马丽娜, 石川, 赵宁, 等.细菌纤维素基纳米生物材料在储能领域的应用[J].无机材料学报, 2020, 35(2):145-157.

    2. [2]

      韩国程, 郭蕊, 俞朝晖.细菌纳米纤维素在造纸工业中的应用[J].化工新型材料, 2021, 49(1):52-55.

    3. [3]

      罗争辉, 张家平.细菌纤维素复合抗菌敷料的研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2018, 34(5):314-317.

    4. [4]

      ANDRIANI D, APRIYANA A Y, KARINA M.The optimization of bacterial cellulose production and its applications:A review[J].Cellulose, 2020, 27(12):6747-6766.

    5. [5]

      KUSWANDI B, ASIH N P N, PRATOKO D K, et al.Edible pH sensor based on immobilized red cabbage anthocyanins into bacterial cellulose membrane for intelligent food packaging[J].Packaging Technology and Science, 2020, 33(8):321-332.

    6. [6]

      张婷婷, 冯颖杰, 杨宗灿, 等.利用废烟末发酵制备细菌纤维素[J].食品与机械, 2020, 36(6):198-202.

    7. [7]

      YE J B, ZHENG S S, ZHANG Z, et al.Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 23767 using tobacco waste extract as culture medium[J].Bioresource Technology, 2019, 274:518-524.

    8. [8]

      丁一郎, 叶建斌, 杨金初, 等.生物制备全烟草组分再造烟叶及结构特性分析[J].烟草科技, 2022, 55(7):56-65.

    9. [9]

      洪帆, 宋洁, 白洁, 等.细菌纤维素的功能化改性研究进展[J].精细化工, 2021, 38(12):2377-2384.

    10. [10]

      郭永才, 张长安, 李彦周, 等.复烤烟叶挥发性香味成分同时蒸馏萃取的优化研究[J].农产品加工, 2021(5):15-18.

    11. [11]

      闫洪洋, 黄启蒙, 蔡兴华, 等.产香菌株的分离鉴定及其发酵产物在卷烟加香中的应用[J].轻工学报, 2021, 36(6):47-54.

    12. [12]

      侯皓男, 毕金峰, 陈芹芹, 等.压差闪蒸干燥改善红枣脆片理化和营养品质的研究[J].现代食品科技, 2019, 35(11):161-169.

    13. [13]

      GEORGE J, SAJEEVKUMAR V A, KUMAR R, et al.Enhancement of thermal stability associated with the chemical treatment of bacterial (Gluconacetobacter xylinus) cellulose[J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2008, 108(3):1845-1851.

    14. [14]

      孙彦.生物分离工程[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2005.

    15. [15]

      冯劲, 施庆珊, 冯静, 等.不同干燥方式对细菌纤维素物理性能的影响[J].现代食品科技, 2013, 29(9):2225-2229.

    16. [16]

      胡亿明, 蒋剑春, 孙云娟, 等.纤维素的加压热解特性及动力学研究[J].可再生能源, 2013, 31(7):70-76.

    17. [17]

      刘家豪, 辛颖, 薛伟, 等.基于热重分析的帽儿山地区6种乔木燃烧性研究[J].森林工程, 2023, 39(1):54-62.

    18. [18]

      田华.细菌纤维素高产菌株的选育及突变效应的初步研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学, 2012.

    19. [19]

      任泽祺, 张东杰.干燥方法对细菌纤维素膜特性及结构的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2017, 38(3):91-96.

    20. [20]

      郑梅霞, 肖荣凤, 陈梅春, 等.不同干燥方式对细菌纤维素复水性能的影响[J].福建农业学报, 2021, 36(12):1499-1505.

    21. [21]

      汤晓东, 苏燕, 张丽娜, 等.GC-MS法分析烟用香精中10种有机酸[J].烟草科技, 2021, 54(4):49-56.

    22. [22]

      李晓婷, 荣凡番, 罗云, 等.典型香型间和地区间烟叶中性致香物质组成与含量差异[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 32(6):1036-1044.

    23. [23]

      刘少军.宜宾市烤烟焦甜香韵特征物质分析[D].雅安:四川农业大学, 2019.

    24. [24]

      曹建敏, 别瑞, 王玉华, 等.烤烟新品种中烟特香301特征香气物质研究[J].中国烟草科学, 2022, 43(2):64-70.

Article Metrics

Article views(3618) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()

Ralated
    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return