基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法

付金华; 聂南; 李刚; 邓璐娟; 李金萌; 张彤

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

CN 41-1437/TS ISSN 2096-1553

基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法

付金华 , 聂南 , 李刚 , 邓璐娟 , 李金萌 , 张彤

付金华, 聂南, 李刚, 等. 基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2015, 30(5-6): 104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

引用本文: 付金华, 聂南, 李刚, 等. 基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2015, 30(5-6): 104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

FU Jin-hua, NIE Nan, LI Gang, et al. The quality evaluation method of mobile client software based on AHP[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2015, 30(5-6): 104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

Citation: FU Jin-hua, NIE Nan, LI Gang, et al. The quality evaluation method of mobile client software based on AHP[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2015, 30(5-6): 104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法

郑州轻工业学院计算机与通信工程学院, 河南郑州 450001;
郑州轻工业学院数学与信息科学学院, 河南郑州 450002;
郑州轻工业学院软件学院, 河南郑州 450001;
河南省863软件孵化器有限公司软件评测中心, 河南郑州 450001
基金项目: 郑州市科技攻关项目(131PPTGG411-8)
河南省自然科学基金项目(2010A520039)
国家自然科学基金项目(61201447)
中图分类号: TP311

The quality evaluation method of mobile client software based on AHP

College of Computer and Communication Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
College of Software, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
Software Test Center, He'nan 863 Software Incubator Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450001, China
Received Date: 2015-06-05
Available Online: 2015-11-15
CLC number: TP311

摘要: 针对未有正式的面向移动客户端的软件质量评测模型的现状,提出一种基于层次分析法(AHP)的移动客户端软件产品质量评价方法.该方法通过对移动客户端软件的特性分析,归纳出移动客户端软件常见质量需求、功能和特点,制订移动客户端软件质量评价建议权重表.采用AHP对移动客户端软件进行分析,构造判断矩阵对权重进行动态修正,通过一致性检验结果对软件质量进行评测.结合实例验证了该方法能够改进其评测的不恰当的权值,从而使得移动客户端软件的评测客观、量化,为建立正式的移动客户端软件质量评测模型提供参考.
- 层次分析法 /
- 移动客户端 /
- 软件质量评测模型
Abstract: Aiming at the situation that there was no formal quality evaluation model oriented to mobile client, a quality evaluation method of mobile client based on AHP was proposed. Via the analysis of mobile client software, the quality requirements, functions and features were concluded. The evaluation recommended weight table of mobile client software quality was formulated. The AHP was adopted to analyze the mobile client software and to construct judgment matrix to carry on the dynamic correction, and to measure the quality of software through the consistency check results. Examples showed that this method was able to improve its inappropriate weights of evaluation, so as to make the mobile client software evaluation objective and quantitative, to offer reference for establishing a formal mobile client software quality evaluation model.
- analytic hierarchy process(AHP) /
- mobile client /
- software quality evaluation model
1. [1]
  聂南,邓璐娟,夏启明,等.面向不同行业软件的质量评测模型及实践[J].计算机科学,2011,38(2):156.
2. [2]
  李刚,曲双红,辛向军,等.引入特征AHP的PDEA评价模型研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2009,39(13):105.
3. [3]
  孙宏才,田平,王莲芬.网络层次分析法与决策科学[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2011:2-58.
4. [4]
  丁斌,孙连禄.基于多标准的ABC分类库存模型[J].电子科技大学学报:社科版,2013,15(2):31.
5. [5]
  郭玉翠,刘思奇,雷敏,等.基于一般系统论的信息安全系统的理论研究[J].电子科技大学学报,2013,42(5):728.
6. [6]
  杨宝臣,陈跃.基于组合赋权TOPSIS模型的项目评标方法研究[J].电子科技大学学报:社科版,2011,13(1):1.
7. [7]
  宋杰,李甜甜,朱志良,等.云数据管理系统能耗基准测试与分析[J].计算机学报,2013,36(7):1485.
1. [1]
  卢晓波 , 徐海 , 朱俊召 , 张宇 , 谭健 , 高冠男 , 胡军华 , 林龙 . 基于机器视觉的加热卷烟烟支端部质量检测系统设计. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
2. [2]
  刘广超 , 邓莎 , 高峄涵 , 吴涛 , 邓锐杰 . 加热卷烟辊压法薄片丝吸湿性影响因素研究. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 109-117. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.013
3. [3]
  张伟伟 , 姬远鹏 , 元春波 , 王君婷 , 齐晓任 , 张卫正 , 李萌 , 饶智 . 基于改进Mask R-CNN模型的粘连烟丝识别方法. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 78-85. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.009
4. [4]
  费致根 , 鲁豪 , 宋晓晓 , 赵鑫昌 , 郭兴 , 肖艳秋 . 基于改进ResNet网络的烟丝输送带洁净度分类模型. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 71-77. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.008
5. [5]
  张建栋 , 杨忠泮 , 吴恋恋 , 徐大勇 , 朱萍 , 张雯晶 , 堵劲松 . 基于高光谱成像及机器学习的烟叶糖料液施加量判别模型. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 86-94. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.010

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 35
文章访问数: 1547
引证文献数: 0

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

付金华, 聂南, 李刚, 等. 基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2015, 30(5-6): 104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

引用本文: 付金华, 聂南, 李刚, 等. 基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法[J]. 轻工学报, 2015, 30(5-6): 104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-476X.2015.5/6.021

基于AHP的移动客户端软件评测方法

郑州轻工业学院计算机与通信工程学院, 河南郑州 450001;
郑州轻工业学院数学与信息科学学院, 河南郑州 450002;
郑州轻工业学院软件学院, 河南郑州 450001;
河南省863软件孵化器有限公司软件评测中心, 河南郑州 450001

收稿日期: 2015-06-05
网络出版日期: 2015-11-15

基金项目: 郑州市科技攻关项目(131PPTGG411-8)河南省自然科学基金项目(2010A520039)国家自然科学基金项目(61201447)

关键词:

摘要: 针对未有正式的面向移动客户端的软件质量评测模型的现状,提出一种基于层次分析法(AHP)的移动客户端软件产品质量评价方法.该方法通过对移动客户端软件的特性分析,归纳出移动客户端软件常见质量需求、功能和特点,制订移动客户端软件质量评价建议权重表.采用AHP对移动客户端软件进行分析,构造判断矩阵对权重进行动态修正,通过一致性检验结果对软件质量进行评测.结合实例验证了该方法能够改进其评测的不恰当的权值,从而使得移动客户端软件的评测客观、量化,为建立正式的移动客户端软件质量评测模型提供参考.

English Abstract

The quality evaluation method of mobile client software based on AHP

College of Computer and Communication Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
College of Software, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
Software Test Center, He'nan 863 Software Incubator Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received Date: 2015-06-05
Available Online: 2015-11-15

Abstract: Aiming at the situation that there was no formal quality evaluation model oriented to mobile client, a quality evaluation method of mobile client based on AHP was proposed. Via the analysis of mobile client software, the quality requirements, functions and features were concluded. The evaluation recommended weight table of mobile client software quality was formulated. The AHP was adopted to analyze the mobile client software and to construct judgment matrix to carry on the dynamic correction, and to measure the quality of software through the consistency check results. Examples showed that this method was able to improve its inappropriate weights of evaluation, so as to make the mobile client software evaluation objective and quantitative, to offer reference for establishing a formal mobile client software quality evaluation model.

参考文献 (7) 相关文章 (5)