PANG Long, ZHANG Xiao-jing, MA Yong-peng, et al. Accounting method of the emission performance value of the major pollutants in papermaking industry[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2017, 32(2): 84-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.013
Citation:
PANG Long, ZHANG Xiao-jing, MA Yong-peng, et al. Accounting method of the emission performance value of the major pollutants in papermaking industry[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2017, 32(2): 84-90.
doi:
10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.013
Accounting method of the emission performance value of the major pollutants in papermaking industry
-
College of Material and Chemical Engineering/Collaborative Innovation Center of Environmental Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration of He'nan Province, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China
-
Received Date:
2016-06-28
Available Online:
2017-03-15
-
Abstract
Take the example of pulp and paper companies,advantages and disadvantages of several commonly used accounting methods for the emission performance value of chemical oxygen demand (COD) were compared.Methods such as correlation analysis, linear regression, and weighted average were proposed as potential tools for the calculation of COD emission performance value.Comparison was made with the traditional methods of pollution discharging coefficient, quota standard, and recommended value of the interim measure,the performance values were determined,which could really reflect the emission status of the papermaking enterprises. The recommended values for waste paper, old corrugated paper, old cardboard box, and wheat straw pulp and paper companies were 3162 g/t, 3349 g/t, 1744 g/t, and 3600 g/t, respectively, with the qualification rate of 50%~57%.Regarding to the difference of environment capacity in various regions, a method was proposed for setting special discharge performance values by using quota standard method.
-
-
References
-
[1]
COASE R H.The Market,the Firm, and the Law[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1988.
-
[2]
DALES J H.Pollution, Property and Prices[M].Toronto:University of Toronto Press, 1968.
-
[3]
任艳红,周树勋.基于总量控制的排污权交易机制改革思路研究[J].环境科学与管理, 2016, 41(3):19.
-
[4]
魏圣香, 王慧.美国排污权交易机制的得失及其镜鉴[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 13(6):34.
-
[5]
于术桐, 黄贤金, 程绪水, 等.流域排污权初始分配模式选择[J].资源科学, 2009, 31(7):1175.
-
[6]
WOERDMAN E.Implementing the Kyoto protocol:Why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading[J].Energy Policy, 2000, 28(1):29.
-
[7]
张玮, 白金.排放绩效在火电行业大气污染物排放总量核定中的应用分析[J].环境与发展, 2015(2):11.
-
[8]
第一次全国污染源普查资料编篡委员会.第一次全国污染源普查资料文集——污染源普查产排污系数手册:上册[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2011.
-
Proportional views
-
-