JOURNAL OF LIGHT INDUSTRY

CN 41-1437/TS  ISSN 2096-1553

Volume 34 Issue 2
March 2019
Article Contents
LI Xiao, CHEN Ruiqian, HE Chao, et al. Comparative analysis of different methods for measuring the volume of expanded tobacco stem before and after rejuvenation[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2019, 34(2): 10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2019.02.002
Citation: LI Xiao, CHEN Ruiqian, HE Chao, et al. Comparative analysis of different methods for measuring the volume of expanded tobacco stem before and after rejuvenation[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2019, 34(2): 10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2019.02.002 shu

Comparative analysis of different methods for measuring the volume of expanded tobacco stem before and after rejuvenation

  • Received Date: 2018-06-20
  • In order to quantitatively analyze the volume change of expanded tobacco stem after rejuvenation, the natural accumulation method, filling method and liquid impregnation method were used to measure, analyze and modify the volume of expanded tobacco stem after rejuvenation. At the same time, the correction results of volume were applied to calculate the shrinkage rate of expanded tobacco stem after rejuvenation. The results showed that the liquid impregnation method was more reliable in measuring the volume of expanded tobacco stem after rejuvenation with less fluctuation of data and good stability when compared with natural accumulation and filling method. Based on the results of liquid impregnation method, the linear relationship between liquid impregnation method (y) and natural accumulation method (x1) and filling method (x2) was established. The modified expressions were that:y=0.352x1-41.744, y=0.772x2-19.874, and the correlation coefficients R2 were 0.922 and 0.959, respectively. The volume of expanded tobacco stem after rejuvenation by modified natural accumulation method and filling method was close to that by liquid impregnation method, which is more accurate than that before amendment. The results showed that all three methods could be used to measure the volume of expanded tobacco stem, which need to be modified by liquid impregnation method to obtain more accurate results.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      杨威,张强,董高峰,等.微波膨胀对烟梗品质及显微结构的影响[J].江西农业学报,2014(3):69.

    2. [2]

      刘华,谭奇忠,何蓉,等.梗预处理工艺的优化[C]//2010年中国烟草学会工业专业委员会工艺学组学术研讨会论文集.青岛:中国烟草学会,2010:152-155.

    3. [3]

      熊安言,孙觅,王镇增,等.浸梗工艺探讨[J].烟草科技,2006(3):9.

    4. [4]

      朱俊召,张楚安,陈慧斌,等.浸梗和微波润梗技术在制丝工艺中的研究应用[J].烟草科技,2010(5):5.

    5. [5]

      张军,赵汉文.切梗厚度对STS模式膨胀梗丝整丝转化率和使用效果的影响[J].科技创新导报,2011(3):39.

    6. [6]

      王慧,曾晓鹰,杨涛,等.微波膨胀烟梗制备颗粒应用于卷烟的效果评价[J].烟草科技,2008(10):5.

    7. [7]

      李晓,周利军,李全胜,等.烟梗形变工艺对微波膨胀梗制得梗丝综合质量的影响[J].南方农业学报,2016,47(5):715.

    8. [8]

      赵云川,邹泉,廖晓祥,等.微波膨胀梗丝加工工艺的选择及优化[J].烟草科技,2016(12):60.

    9. [9]

      杨传祖,李雪梅,邱晔,等.微波烘烤对烤烟梗丝填充力及内在化学成分的影响[J].中国烟草学报,1997,3(2):1.

    10. [10]

      于建军,李世勇,李国栋,等.微波烘烤对烟丝填充力及吸食品质的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2001,35(1):50.

    11. [11]

      何炬,刘维涓,师建全,等.微波膨胀烟梗质量研究[J].烟草科技,2006(2):9.

    12. [12]

      李军,资文华,宋莲英,等.陈化时间对微波膨胀烟梗加工过程物理特性的影响[J].烟草科技,2010(11):15.

    13. [13]

      席年生,申玉军,储国海,等.不同施压条件下梗丝填充值与其膨胀效果的相关性[J].烟草科技,2003(9):3.

    14. [14]

      陈晶铃,陈明功,汪晓艳,等.烟梗微波膨化基本规律的研究[J].安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,28(3):61.

    15. [15]

      国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品试样的制备和水分测定烘箱法:YC/T31-1996[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1996-10-07.

    16. [16]

      杨涛,李敏,李姗姗,等.微波膨胀过程中烟梗及由其制备的颗粒的物理化学变化[J].烟草科技,2008(2):33.

    17. [17]

      路兰卿,程潮,任宏杰,等.膨后烟梗的膨胀率测定方法研究[J].机电产品开发与创新,2017,30(4):34.

    18. [18]

      李军,陈婉,资文华,等.高压脉冲电场处理对微波膨胀烟梗萎缩的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2011,17(1):45.

Article Metrics

Article views(1046) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()

Ralated
    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return