不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析

许春平; 王充; 李萌姗; 马扩彦; 曲利利; 冉盼盼; 孟丹丹; 吴彦

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

CN 41-1437/TS ISSN 2096-1553

不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析

许春平 , 王充 , 李萌姗 , 马扩彦 , 曲利利 , 冉盼盼 , 孟丹丹 , 吴彦

许春平, 王充, 李萌姗, 等. 不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析[J]. 轻工学报, 2017, 32(2): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

引用本文: 许春平, 王充, 李萌姗, 等. 不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析[J]. 轻工学报, 2017, 32(2): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

XU Chun-ping, WANG Chong, LI Meng-shan, et al. The principal component analysis on volatile components of flue-cured tobacco bud extract from different producing areas[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2017, 32(2): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

Citation: XU Chun-ping, WANG Chong, LI Meng-shan, et al. The principal component analysis on volatile components of flue-cured tobacco bud extract from different producing areas[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2017, 32(2): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析

郑州轻工业学院食品与生物工程学院, 河南郑州 450001;
重庆中烟工业有限责任公司技术研发中心, 重庆 400060;
广西中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心, 广西南宁530001

通讯作者: 吴彦

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金联合基金项目（U1604176）
中图分类号: TS41

The principal component analysis on volatile components of flue-cured tobacco bud extract from different producing areas

College of Food and Bioengineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
Technical Development Center, China Tobacco Chongqing Industrial Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400060, China;
Technical Center, China Tobacco Guangxi Industrial Co., Ltd., Nanning 530001, China

Corresponding author: WU Yan,

Received Date: 2016-02-15
Available Online: 2017-03-15
CLC number: TS41

摘要: 采用超声水提法制备6种不同产地的烤烟花蕾浸膏，并添加进卷烟进行感官评吸，从中选取2种评吸感觉较好和1种评吸感觉较差的浸膏，采用溶剂萃取法提取其挥发性成分进行GC-MS分析和主成分分析.感官评吸结果表明，6种不同产地的烤烟花蕾浸膏对卷烟加香效果的优劣顺序为：云南文山 > 重庆奉节 > 贵州兴义 > 云南昭通 > 对照样品 > 广西河池 > 湖南邵阳，其中添加了云南文山和重庆奉节烤烟花蕾浸膏的卷烟内在品质比对照样品有明显提升.对云南文山、重庆奉节和湖南邵阳烤烟花蕾浸膏分别进行GC-MS分析，结果表明，其挥发性成分、种类和含量均存在较大差异.主成分分析表明，不同挥发性成分对3种浸膏的影响力不同，对3种浸膏的主成分综合得分进行排序，可得云南文山 > 重庆奉节 > 湖南邵阳，该结果与感官评吸结果一致.
- 烤烟花蕾浸膏 /
- 感官评吸 /
- 挥发性成分
Abstract: Six flue-cured tobacco bud extract samples from different areas were prepared by ultrasonic water extraction method for sensory evaluation.The volatile components from three extract samples including two better and one worse according to sensory evaluation were selected to extract by solvent extraction method and analyzed by GC-MS and principal components analysis.The sensory evaluation results showed that the cigarette flavoring effect order of six different areas of flue-cured tobacco bud extract was:Wenshan,Yunnan > Fengjie,Chongqing > Xingyi,Guizhou > Zhaotong,Yunnan > control > Hechi,Guangxi > Shaoyang,Hunan.The internal quality of cigarette that added the extract samples from Wenshan,Yunnan and Fengjie,Chongqing were improved significantly,compared with the control.The extract samples from Wenshan,Yunnan,Fengjie,Chongqing and Shaoyang,Hunan were analyzed by GC-MS.The results showed that the volatile components,types and content of extract samples from different areas were quite different.Principal components analysis showed that the influence of extract samples from three different origins were different.The order according to score of the principal component of three extract samples was:Wenshan,Yunnan > Fengjie,Chongqing > Shaoyang,Hunan,which was coincident with the results of sensory quality.
- flue-cured tobacco bud extract /
- sensory evaluation /
- volatile component
1. [1]
  满红.烟草打顶抹杈技巧[J].新农村,2012(1):24.
2. [2]
  苏贤坤,张晓海,廖德智.烟草综合利用现状及其前景[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(5):120.
3. [3]
  康武成.提高烟株利用率初探[J].烟草科技,1992(3):36.
4. [4]
  许春平,肖源,孙斯文,等.白肋烟花蕾制备烟用香料[J].烟草科技,2014(11):57.
5. [5]
  许春平,刘远上,肖源,等.超声波水提法提取烤烟花蕾香料工艺的研究[J].贵州农业科学,2014(12):209.
6. [6]
  郭方遒,钟科军,黄建国,等.烟用香精香气成分提取方法的选择[J].烟草科技,2005(12):20.
7. [7]
  孟鸳,乔宇,康旭,等.同时蒸馏萃取、溶剂萃取和顶空固相微萃取与GC-MS联用分析甜面酱的挥发性成分[J].中国调味品,2011,36(1):97.
8. [8]
  中国国家标准化管理委员会.卷烟第四部分:感官技术要求:GB5606.4-2005[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005.
9. [9]
  王光辉,熊少祥.有机质谱解析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
10. [10]
  李小胜,陈珍珍.如何正确应用SPSS软件做主成分分析[J].统计研究,2010,27(8):105.
11. [11]
  JOLLI I T.Principal component analysis[J].Springerbriefs in Optimization,2013,16(11):576.
12. [12]
  周玲.乌龙茶香气挥发性成分及其感官性质分析[D].重庆:西南大学,2006.
13. [13]
  唐会周,明建.5种市售脐橙果实香气成分的主成分分析[J].食品科学,2011(20):175.
14. [14]
  吴亚非,李科.基于SPSS的主成分分析法在评价体系中的应用[J].当代经济,2009(3):166.
15. [15]
  吕国锋,高建荣,黄国东,等.合成维生素A醋酸酯新工艺的研究[J].浙江工业大学学报,2006,34(6):614.
16. [16]
  徐晓燕,孙五三,王能如.烟草多酚类化合物的合成与烟叶品质的关系[J].中国烟草科学,2003,24(1):3.
17. [17]
  史宏志.烟草香味学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011.
18. [18]
  穆旻,郑福平,孙宝国,等.麦芽酚和乙基麦芽酚的合成及其在食品工业中的应用[J].中国食品学报,2006,6(1):407.
1. [1]
  张丽华 , 陈云莉 , 石勇 , 李顺峰 , 查蒙蒙 , 李昌文 , 纵伟 , 王小媛 . 植物乳杆菌发酵对红枣汁挥发性香气成分的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
2. [2]
  池哲翔 , 廖敏 , 史尚 , 李声毅 , 廖芸 , 丁冬 . 国外烟草活性成分提取及纤维材料利用现状与展望. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 42
文章访问数: 1224
引证文献数: 0

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

许春平, 王充, 李萌姗, 等. 不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析[J]. 轻工学报, 2017, 32(2): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

引用本文: 许春平, 王充, 李萌姗, 等. 不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析[J]. 轻工学报, 2017, 32(2): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1553.2017.2.008

不同产地烤烟花蕾浸膏挥发性成分的主成分分析

通讯作者: 吴彦

郑州轻工业学院食品与生物工程学院, 河南郑州 450001;
重庆中烟工业有限责任公司技术研发中心, 重庆 400060;
广西中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心, 广西南宁530001

收稿日期: 2016-02-15
网络出版日期: 2017-03-15

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金联合基金项目（U1604176）

关键词:

摘要: 采用超声水提法制备6种不同产地的烤烟花蕾浸膏，并添加进卷烟进行感官评吸，从中选取2种评吸感觉较好和1种评吸感觉较差的浸膏，采用溶剂萃取法提取其挥发性成分进行GC-MS分析和主成分分析.感官评吸结果表明，6种不同产地的烤烟花蕾浸膏对卷烟加香效果的优劣顺序为：云南文山 > 重庆奉节 > 贵州兴义 > 云南昭通 > 对照样品 > 广西河池 > 湖南邵阳，其中添加了云南文山和重庆奉节烤烟花蕾浸膏的卷烟内在品质比对照样品有明显提升.对云南文山、重庆奉节和湖南邵阳烤烟花蕾浸膏分别进行GC-MS分析，结果表明，其挥发性成分、种类和含量均存在较大差异.主成分分析表明，不同挥发性成分对3种浸膏的影响力不同，对3种浸膏的主成分综合得分进行排序，可得云南文山 > 重庆奉节 > 湖南邵阳，该结果与感官评吸结果一致.

English Abstract

The principal component analysis on volatile components of flue-cured tobacco bud extract from different producing areas

Corresponding author: WU Yan,

College of Food and Bioengineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
Technical Development Center, China Tobacco Chongqing Industrial Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400060, China;
Technical Center, China Tobacco Guangxi Industrial Co., Ltd., Nanning 530001, China

Received Date: 2016-02-15
Available Online: 2017-03-15

Abstract: Six flue-cured tobacco bud extract samples from different areas were prepared by ultrasonic water extraction method for sensory evaluation.The volatile components from three extract samples including two better and one worse according to sensory evaluation were selected to extract by solvent extraction method and analyzed by GC-MS and principal components analysis.The sensory evaluation results showed that the cigarette flavoring effect order of six different areas of flue-cured tobacco bud extract was:Wenshan,Yunnan > Fengjie,Chongqing > Xingyi,Guizhou > Zhaotong,Yunnan > control > Hechi,Guangxi > Shaoyang,Hunan.The internal quality of cigarette that added the extract samples from Wenshan,Yunnan and Fengjie,Chongqing were improved significantly,compared with the control.The extract samples from Wenshan,Yunnan,Fengjie,Chongqing and Shaoyang,Hunan were analyzed by GC-MS.The results showed that the volatile components,types and content of extract samples from different areas were quite different.Principal components analysis showed that the influence of extract samples from three different origins were different.The order according to score of the principal component of three extract samples was:Wenshan,Yunnan > Fengjie,Chongqing > Shaoyang,Hunan,which was coincident with the results of sensory quality.

参考文献 (18) 相关文章 (2)