JOURNAL OF LIGHT INDUSTRY

CN 41-1437/TS  ISSN 2096-1553

Volume 36 Issue 4
September 2021
Article Contents
GUO Huacheng, CHEN Kang, ZHANG Junsong, et al. Influences of different drying modes on cut tobacco structure, rolling quality and mainstream smoke components of slim cigarette[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2021, 36(4): 45-50. doi: 10.12187/2021.04.006
Citation: GUO Huacheng, CHEN Kang, ZHANG Junsong, et al. Influences of different drying modes on cut tobacco structure, rolling quality and mainstream smoke components of slim cigarette[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2021, 36(4): 45-50. doi: 10.12187/2021.04.006 shu

Influences of different drying modes on cut tobacco structure, rolling quality and mainstream smoke components of slim cigarette

  • Received Date: 2021-04-07
  • In order to study the suitability about drying mode and fine tobacco processing, constant temperaturedrying mode, low temperature difference, medium temperature difference and high temperature difference sectional drying modes were used to dry cut tobacco respectively under the same other processing conditions, and the effects of different drying modes on cut tobacco structure, rolling quality and mainstream smoke components of slim cigarette were explored. The results showed that, compared with other drying modes, the structure proportion of cut tobacco dried by high temperature difference sectional drying mode was more suitable for slim cigarette processing. Under the conditions of constant temperature and high temperature difference sectional drying modes, the cigarette weight, drawing resistance, hardness and total ventilation rate of the slim cigarette were close to the design value, and physical quality indexes of the slim cigarette was relatively stable. Under the medium and high temperature difference sectional drying mode, the difference of tar, nicotine between the actual value and the design value were relatively low, and CO content was relatively low. In conclusion, high temperature difference sectional drying mode was suitable to slim cigarette processing.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      朱立权.江苏中烟细支卷烟发展战略探讨[D].长春:吉林大学,2017:1-2.

    2. [2]

      TALHOUT R,RICHTER P,STEPANOV I,et al.Cigarette design features:effects on emission levels, user perception, and behavior[J]. Tobacco Regulatory Science, 2018,4(1):592.

    3. [3]

      KARINE G,CRAWFORD M,ROMAIN G,et al.Consumer perceptions of cigarette design in France:a comparison of regular, slim, pink and plain cigarettes[J]. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2019,21(7):911.

    4. [4]

      唐军,何邦华,温亚东,等.国内细支卷烟加工工艺与加工装备研究进展[J].轻工学报, 2020,35(6):41.

    5. [5]

      陈丞.综合测试台检测细支卷烟的技术改造[J].安徽农业科学, 2016,44(6):309.

    6. [6]

      向军,李莲喜.一种细支烟通用型切纸轮的设计与研究[J].机械工程师,2019(3):120.

    7. [7]

      李海锋,杨皓,宣润泉,等.卷烟纸特性对细支烟主流烟气指标的影响[J].中国造纸,2017,36(6):38.

    8. [8]

      楚文娟,田海英,彭桂新,等.基于卷烟材料参数的细支烟烟气有害成分预测模型[J].烟草科技,2019,52(9):46.

    9. [9]

      李洪涛,杨成.基于混料均匀设计的细支烟烟丝尺寸优化[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,32(2):146.

    10. [10]

      XIN Y N, ZHANG J W, LI B.Drying kinetics of tobacco strips at different air temperatures and relative[J].Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, 2018,132(2):1347.

    11. [11]

      LI B, ZHU W K, WANG P F, et al. Fast drying of cut tobacco in drop tube reactor and its effect on petroleum ether tobacco extracts[J]. Drying Technology, 2018,36(11):1304.

    12. [12]

      胡建军,周冀衡,熊燕,等.烘丝工艺参数对烘后叶丝质量影响的研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2007, 13(6):24.

    13. [13]

      丁美宙,熊安言,马宇平,等.叶丝滚筒干燥工艺参数对卷烟香气风格的影响[J].烟草科技, 2015,48(5):74.

    14. [14]

      王岩,朱文魁,刘楷丽,等.滚筒分段变温干燥方式下烤烟叶丝质量的变化特征[J].烟草科技, 2015,48(8):60.

    15. [15]

      雷振,何金华,黄传喜.不同烘丝工艺参数对烟丝综合质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2019,47(5):190.

    16. [16]

      CHEN A G, REN Z Y, FAN Z P, et al. Two-layered model predictive control strategy of the cut tobacco drying process[J].IEEE Access, 2020,8:155697.

    17. [17]

      BI S H, ZHANG B, MU L L, et al. Optimization of tobacco drying process control based on reinforcement learning[J]. Drying Technology, 2020,38(10):1291.

    18. [18]

      赵凡,李银华,郑伟.薄板烘丝机干头干尾量改进研究[J].包装工程, 2019,40(15):225.

    19. [19]

      CHEN A G, REN Z Y, FAN Z P, et al. Dead band zone model predictive control of cut tobacco drying process[J]. IEEE Access,2020,8:157781.

    20. [20]

      刘远涛,韦文,农李政,等.两段式烘丝工艺参数对卷烟感官质量的影响[J].湖北农业科学, 2016,55(14):3670.

    21. [21]

      张炜, 刘江生, 王道宽, 等. KLD2-3两段式滚筒烘丝机控制模式研究[J].烟草科技, 2013(3):8.

    22. [22]

      中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.卷烟和滤棒物理性能的测定:GB/T 22838-2009[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2009.

    23. [23]

      中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 卷烟用常规分析用吸烟机测定总粒相物和焦油:GB/T 19609-2004[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2004:1-10.

    24. [24]

      中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 卷烟总粒相物中烟碱的测定气相色谱法:GB/T 23355-2009[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2009:1-4.

    25. [25]

      中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 卷烟第5部分主流烟气:GB 5606.5-2005[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005:1-2.

Article Metrics

Article views(4109) PDF downloads(57) Cited by()

Ralated
    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return