超临界CO<sub>2</sub>萃取两种典型品种烟草净油及其致香成分与感官品质对比研究

孙胜南; 卢真保; 赵星宇; 林德洪; 王学娟; 赵世兴; 黄艳; 杨靖

doi:10.12187/2023.04.011

August 2023

Article Contents

SUN Shengnan, LU Zhenbao, ZHAO Xingyu, et al. Comparative study on aroma constituents and sensory quality between two typical varieties of tobacco absolute based on supercritical CO2 fluid extraction[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 84-89. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.011

Citation: SUN Shengnan, LU Zhenbao, ZHAO Xingyu, et al. Comparative study on aroma constituents and sensory quality between two typical varieties of tobacco absolute based on supercritical CO2 fluid extraction[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 84-89. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.011 shu

Comparative study on aroma constituents and sensory quality between two typical varieties of tobacco absolute based on supercritical CO₂ fluid extraction

1. Guangzhou Huafang Tobacco Flavors Company, Guangzhou 510530, China;
2. College of Tobacco Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received Date: 2022-08-26
Accepted Date: 2022-12-12

Abstract

In order to study the effects of different tobacco varieties on the prepared tobacco extracts, Honghuadajinyuan and K326 flue-cured tobacco leaves of the same year, position and grade in Yunlong, Yunnan Province were selected.The tobacco absolute was prepared by supercritical CO₂ fluid extraction technology under the same process conditions.The differences between two tobacco absolutes were analyzed and compared by GC/MS and sensory evaluation in cigarette.The results showed that among the 47 common components identified in the two tobacco absolutes, the top 3 relative contents were nicotine, cibertrienediol and neophydiene. Among the total 15 higher fatty acids and their esters in various types of compounds,the relative contents of K326 tobacco were all higher obviously. In terms of important aroma constituents of tobacco,the relative contents of 10 aroma components including chlorophyll, carotene and cembranoids degradation products were higher in honghuadajinyuan tobacco absolute, while the relative contents of 7 aroma components including phenylalanine degradation products and browning reaction products were higher in K326 tobacco absolute. In the sensory evaluation of cigarette application,the same point of two tobacco absolutes was that they had mainly hay incense and fresh-sweetness aroma, with fruity and green aroma, and the difference was that honghuadajinyuan tobacco absolute could show woody and alcohol-sweetness aroma, while K326 tobacco absolute showed baked, burnt-sweetness and honey sweetness aroma. In terms of virginia tobacco aroma and overall aroma quality,honghuadajinyuan tobacco absolute was relatively better than K326.
- supercritical CO₂ fluid extraction,
- tobacco absolute,
- aroma constituents,
- sensory quality
References
1. [1]
  景延秋, 宫长荣, 屈晓然, 等.超临界流体萃取技术及其在烟草研究中的应用[J].河南农业大学学报, 2005, 39(3):304-307.
2. [2]
  徐清泉, 徐金巧, 陈勇, 等.超临界CO₂萃取烟草致香成分的工艺优化[J].精细化工, 2017, 34(4):431-436.
3. [3]
  易聪华, 冀唯妮, 孔浩辉, 等.烟梗本香物质的超临界CO₂萃取[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(6):103-108.
4. [4]
  何康, 张怀宝, 杜咏梅, 等.超临界CO₂萃取烟花中西柏三烯二醇工艺研究[J].中国烟草科学, 2017, 38(2):81-87.
5. [5]
  李春英, 赵春建, 祖元刚, 等.超临界二氧化碳同时分离烟草提取物中的茄尼醇和辅酶Q10[J].林产化学与工业, 2017, 34(4):431-436.
6. [6]
  丁润波, 马斌, 花蕾, 等. 响应面分析法优化超临界萃取烟末中的茄尼醇[J].兰州文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 35(5):41-45.
7. [7]
  张花, 顾丽莉, 李增良, 等.超临界-超声辅助提取烟叶中的烟油和多酚[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 4(2):362-368.
8. [8]
  崔婷惠, 唐石云, 刘春波, 等.同时蒸馏萃取和超临界流体萃取研究卷烟主流烟气香气成分[J].化学试剂, 2018, 40(2):159-163.
9. [9]
  帖金鑫, 李永生, 郝贤伟, 等.超临界萃取-分子蒸馏分离烟末香味成分提升再造烟叶可用性[J].中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(5):15-24.
10. [10]
  唐李丽, 冯文龙, 熊维亮, 等.我国烤烟主栽品种的研究与思考[J].四川农业科技, 2020(8):79-85.
11. [11]
  胡海, 李先才, 石成广, 等.6个烤烟品种在宣威烟区的适应性研究[J].湖南农业科学, 2022(2):10-15.
12. [12]
  范志勇, 童瑶, 刘成林, 等.云南弥渡烟区烤烟特色品种比较试验[J].安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(3):30-33.
13. [13]
  范志勇, 罗锐, 户艳霞, 等.四种烤烟品种烘烤特性比较[J].天津农业科学, 2020, 26(11):80-86.
14. [14]
  周芳芳, 杨学书, 杨策, 等.云南3个主栽烤烟品种致香成分含量差异及区域特征分析[J].江西农业学报, 2021, 33(10):80-86.
15. [15]
  郭素英, 罗成刚, 胡海洲, 等.优质烤烟品种叶片质体色素变化规律研究[J].农业科技通讯, 2020(4):150-154.
16. [16]
  刘晓云, 刘燕, 祖庆学, 等.不同品种烤烟腺毛分泌物及部分有机酸, 高级脂肪酸的比较分析[J].中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(3):46-55.
17. [17]
  李晓婷, 张静, 保华, 等.云南3个主栽烤烟品种的化学成分含量和区域特征分析[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5):995-1005.
18. [18]
  孙兰茜, 李秋潼, 陈云璨, 等.国内主要烟叶品种(品系)常规化学成分差异分析[J].轻工科技, 2020, 36(7):48-49.
19. [19]
  王正旭, 刘魁, 孙华, 等.玉溪峨山不同烤烟品种烟叶质量综合分析[J].安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(13):23-26.
20. [20]
  国家烟草专卖局. 卷烟中式卷烟风格感官评价方法:YC/T 497-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2014.
21. [21]
  国家烟草专卖局. 烤烟烟叶质量风格特色感官评价方法:YC/T 530-2015[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2015.
22. [22]
  冯颖杰, 杨宗灿, 叶建斌, 等.一种富含吡喃酮的烟草浸膏及制备方法:201911183250.2[P].2019-11-27.
23. [23]
  张悠金, 金闻博.烟用香精香料[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社, 1996:142.
24. [24]
  谢剑平.烟草香原料[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2009:113.
25. [25]
  尧珍玉, 曾池, 施鸣, 等.烟草中关键致香成分积累、降解及其对品质影响的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学, 2017, 45(5):28-31.
26. [26]
  闫克玉.烟草化学[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社. 2002:144-145;221-222.
Proportional views