辊压法全烟梗再造烟叶的制备工艺优化及结构与性能分析
Optimization of preparation process and analysis of structure and performance of rolled reconstituted tobacco based on whole tobacco stem
-
摘要: 使用烟梗粉末和烟叶粉末制备辊压法再造烟叶,通过正交试验确定全烟梗再造烟叶最适工艺参数,对比分析全烟叶和全烟梗再造烟叶的基本理化性质、形貌结构、甘油吸附性能、热失重行为及热释放香味物质差异。结果表明:综合考虑抗张强度和感官品质,以烟梗粉末质量为基准,水、木浆纤维、羧甲基纤维素钠最适添加量分别为75%、2.5%、5%,辊压厚度和烘烤温度则分别为0.25 mm和90 ℃;全烟梗再造烟叶的定量、抗张强度和松厚度分别为265.33 g/m2、0.43 kN/m和 0.83 cm3/g,均优于全烟叶再造烟叶,且表面均一度和烟梗色泽保留度较好,微观孔隙结构丰富,纤维排列相对疏松;全烟梗再造烟叶的甘油静态平衡吸附率为25%,高于全烟叶再造烟叶,吸附过程符合准一级动力学模型,且表现出较大的吸附速率常数;两种再造烟叶表现出相似的四阶段热解失重过程,但全烟梗再造烟叶的热失重阶段Ⅱ和Ⅲ的最大失重速率温度向中间温度集中,两阶段的最大失重速率和综合热解指数均大于全烟叶再造烟叶,综合热解性能更优;全烟梗再造烟叶在阶段Ⅲ释放的香味物质为41种,含量为3 410.49 μg/g,高于阶段Ⅱ的热释放香味物质种类和含量,其中烟碱、新植二烯、2,3-二氢-3,5-二羟基-6-甲基-4(H)-吡喃-4-酮、糠醇等香味物质均能够有效释放。以烟梗为原料制备的辊压法再造烟叶具有较好的抗张强度和松厚度,微观孔隙结构丰富,加热状态下能保证香味物质的有效释放,良好的料香负载能力和较低的原料成本显示了其在加热卷烟中较好的应用潜力。Abstract: Tobacco stem power and tobacco leave power were used to prepare rolled reconstituted tobacco, the suitable process parameters for reconstituted tobacco based on stem were determined through orthogonal experiments. The basic physicochemical properties, microstructure, glycerol adsorption performance, thermal weight loss characteristics and released aroma components under heating conditions were compared between the reconstituted tobacco prepared from whole tobacco leaves and stem. The results showed that the optimal addition amounts of water, wood pulp fiber, and carboxymethyl cellulose sodium were 75%, 2.5%, and 5% based on tobacco stem power, respectively, from the perspective of tensile strength and sensory quality. The rolled thickness and baking temperature were selected as 0.25 mm and 90 ℃, respectively. The quantitative, tensile strength, and bulk thickness of whole stem reconstituted tobacco leaves were 265.33 g/m2, 0.43 kN/m, and 0.83 cm3/g, respectively, which were superior to that of reconstituted tobacco based on whole leaves. The surface uniformity and color retention were good, the micro-pore structure was rich, and the fiber arrangement was relatively loose. The static equilibrium adsorption rate of glycerol in whole stem reconstituted tobacco was 25.0%, which was higher than that in whole leaves reconstituted tobacco. The adsorption process follows a quasi first order kinetic model and exhibited higher adsorption rate constant. Both types of whole leaves reconstituted tobacco exhibited similar four stage thermal decomposition weight loss processes. But the temperature for thermal weight loss stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ of whole stem reconstituted tobacco were more concentrated. The maximum weight loss rate and CPI of these two stages were higher than those of whole leaves reconstituted tobacco. The types and contents of aroma compounds released by whole stem reconstituted tobacco leaves in stage Ⅲ were 41, with a content of 3 410.49 μ g/g, all of which were higher than the types and contents of heat released aroma compounds in stage Ⅱ. Among them nicotine, neonicotinoid, DDMP, furfuryl alcohol and other aroma substances could be effectively released. The rolled reconstituted tobacco prepared by tobacco stem had good tensile strength and loose thickness, rich micro-pore structure, and effective release performance for aroma substances under heating conditions.The good fragrance loading capacity and low raw material cost demonstrated its potential for application in heated cigarettes.
-
-
[1]
张金磊,秦云华,杨柳,等.造纸法再造烟叶品质提升技术研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2023,29(5):116-121.
-
[2]
BOUÉ S,SCHLAGE W K,PAGE D,et al.Toxicological assessment of tobacco heating system 2.2:Findings from an independent peer review[J].Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,2019,104:115-127.
-
[3]
赵玉宇,崔成哲,朱良华,等.加热不燃烧烟草制品的减害性能分析[J].科技创新与应用,2020,10(22):66-67.
-
[4]
SIMONAVICIUS E,MCNEILL A,SHAHAB L,et al.Heat-not-burn tobacco products:A systematic literature review[J].Tobacco Control,2019,28(5):582-594.
-
[5]
卢乐华,高洁,费菲,等.不同工艺电加热卷烟再造烟叶主要成分的释放性能[J].烟草科技,2023,56(3):30-40
,77. -
[6]
李奕蓉,汤丹瑜,刘春波,等.三种新型工艺加热卷烟再造烟叶的对比[J].烟草科技,2023,56(6):59-68.
-
[7]
杨菁,赵文涛,艾明欢,等.不同类型的加热卷烟原料性能比较[J].中国烟草学报,2020,26(3):1-8.
-
[8]
司晓喜,唐石云,朱瑞芝,等.不同原料稠浆法再造烟叶加热卷烟的气溶胶释放特性[J].中国烟草学报,2021,27(6):1-9.
-
[9]
赵璐,王丙武,宋中邦,等.基于感官评价的加热不燃烧卷烟原料品种(系)筛选[J].烟草科技,2020,53(1):21-28.
-
[10]
苏丹丹,王小升,张文军,等.不同梗叶比例对造纸法再造烟叶片基的影响[J].纸和造纸,2019,38(1):28-31.
-
[11]
董高峰,田永峰,唐石云,等.梗叶配比对加热卷烟专用稠浆法再造烟叶品质的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2021,27(1):31-36.
-
[12]
郭春生,王轶群,陈晨,等.甘油对不同部位烤烟香味成分释放行为的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2023,44(2):88-96.
-
[13]
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.纸和纸板抗张强度的测定 恒速拉伸法:GB/T12914—2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
-
[14]
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.纸和纸板定量的测定:GB/T 451.2—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
-
[15]
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.纸和纸板厚度的测定:GB/T 451.3—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
-
[16]
国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品 水溶性糖的测定 连续流动法:YC/T 159—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
-
[17]
国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品 总氮的测定 连续流动法:YC/T 161—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
-
[18]
国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品 钾的测定 连续流动法:YC/T 217—2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
-
[19]
国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品 氯的测定 连续流动法:YC/T 162—2011[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
-
[20]
国家烟草专卖局.烟草及烟草制品 烟碱的测定 气相色谱法:YC/T 246—2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
-
[21]
刘天择,杨菁,汪旭,等.不同部位烤烟化学成分及热解产物与加热卷烟感官质量的关系[J].中国烟草科学,2023,44(1):77-84.
-
[22]
朱宏阳,姚俊,冯珊,等.1株产细菌纤维素芽胞杆菌的分离及鉴定[J].生物加工过程,2014,12(5):80-84.
-
[23]
PAREEK N,GILLGREN T,JÖNSSON L J.Adsorption of proteins involved in hydrolysis of lignocellulose on lignins and hemicelluloses[J].Bioresource Technology,2013,148:70-77.
-
[24]
高峄涵,李祥林,冯智渊,等.3种电加热卷烟专用再造烟叶的甘油饱和吸附特性[J].烟草科技,2022,55(5):41-49.
-
[25]
艾明欢,杨菁,沈轶,等.TG-FTIR联用研究HnB烟草基质在400 ℃以下的热解特性和气相产物[J].中国烟草学报,2020,26(1):8-14.
-
[26]
霍现宽,刘珊,崔凯,等.加热状态下烟草烟气香味成分释放特征[J].烟草科技,2017,50(8):37-45.
-
[27]
唐培培,曾世通,刘珊,等.甘油对烟叶热性能及加热状态下烟气释放的影响[J].烟草科技,2015,48(3):61-65.
-
[28]
王玉华,褚建忠,徐丙升,等.烤烟自然醇化过程美拉德反应产物变化及与感官质量的关系[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(4):85-90.
-
[29]
白冰,何静,杨静,等.美拉德反应中间体二氢-3,5-二羟基-6-甲基-4(H)吡喃-4-酮的研究进展[J].食品与发酵工业,2024,50(5):326-333.
-
[1]
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20019/2001989e162699cbdf32bd18c30e2d0bf2cb7ce3" alt="WeChat"
计量
- PDF下载量: 4
- 文章访问数: 83
- 引证文献数: 0