JOURNAL OF LIGHT INDUSTRY

CN 41-1437/TS  ISSN 2096-1553

乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响

宋丽丽 霍姗浩 冯梦琪 杨旭 张志平 张靖楠 魏涛

宋丽丽, 霍姗浩, 冯梦琪, 等. 乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011
引用本文: 宋丽丽, 霍姗浩, 冯梦琪, 等. 乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011
SONG Lili, HUO Shanhao, FENG Mengqi, et al. Effect of pretreatment with Irpex lacteus on lactic acid production from tobacco stalks[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011
Citation: SONG Lili, HUO Shanhao, FENG Mengqi, et al. Effect of pretreatment with Irpex lacteus on lactic acid production from tobacco stalks[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011

乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响

    作者简介: 宋丽丽(1987-),女,河南省信阳市人,郑州轻工业大学讲师,博士,主要研究方向为烟草生物技术。E-mail:sll@zzuli.edu.cn;
  • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(21706244);河南省科技攻关项目(222102320331,232102321144,232102110150)

  • 中图分类号: TS49

Effect of pretreatment with Irpex lacteus on lactic acid production from tobacco stalks

  • Received Date: 2023-04-03
    Accepted Date: 2023-05-27

    CLC number: TS49

  • 摘要: 针对烟秆结构致密、尼古丁抑制作用强及纤维质糖类物质转化效率低等问题,采用乳白耙菌预处理烟秆,比较预处理前后烟秆组分和结构变化,研究乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆酶解糖化效果的影响,并进一步比较不同发酵方式下(同步糖化发酵、分批发酵)凝结芽孢杆菌发酵烟秆后乳酸的转化率。结果表明:经乳白耙菌预处理20 d后,烟秆中木质素质量分数较原料烟秆降低了44.90%,乳白耙菌可选择性地破坏木质素大分子结构,木质素苯环及侧链基团均存在不同程度的降解;乳白耙菌预处理后的烟秆纤维素可反应性提升,葡萄糖的产量为260 mg/g,较原料烟秆提高了2.25倍;相较于分批发酵,同步糖化发酵的乳酸产量较高(392.16 mg/g),乳酸转化率达到86.95%,较原料烟秆提高了3.78倍。乳白耙菌预处理可选择性降解烟秆木质素,降低烟秆酶解糖化抗性,提升烟秆乳酸的转化率。
    1. [1]

      GUO G N, LIU X, LI R, et al.Characterization of tobacco stalk lignin using nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry and its pyrolysis behavior at different temperatures[J].Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2019, 142:104665.

    2. [2]

      SU Y L, XIAN H, SHI S J, et al.Biodegradation of lignin and nicotine with white rot fungi for the delignification and detoxification of tobacco stalk[J].BMC Biotechnology, 2016, 16:81.

    3. [3]

      龚贵平, 吴波, 刘林培, 等.秸秆基乳酸微生物细胞工厂研究进展[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(5):556-565.

    4. [4]

      AJALA E O, OLONADE Y O, AJALA M A, et al.Lactic acid production from lignocellulose:A review of major challenges and selected solutions[J].ChemBioEng Reviews, 2020, 7(2):38.

    5. [5]

      ESQUIVEL-HERNÁNDEZ D A, GARCÍA-PÉREZ J S, LÓPEZ-PACHECO I Y, et al.Resource recovery of lignocellulosic biomass waste into lactic acid-trends to sustain cleaner production[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 301:113925.

    6. [6]

      ABDEL-RAHMAN M A, TASHIRO Y, SONOMOTO K, et al.Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria:Overview and limits[J].Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 156(4):286-301.

    7. [7]

      KUO Y C, YUAN S F, WANG C A, et al.Production of optically pure L-lactic acid from lignocellulosic hydrolysate by using a newly isolated and D-lactate dehydrogenase gene-deficient Lactobacillus paracasei strain[J].Bioresource Technology, 2015, 198:651-657.

    8. [8]

      NWAMBA M C, SUN F B, MUKASEKURU M R, et al.Trends and hassles in the microbial production of lactic acid from lignocellulosic biomass[J].Environmental Technology and Innovation, 2021, 21:101337.

    9. [9]

      宋丽丽, 张志平, 王光路, 等.不同预处理方法对烟杆酶解产糖和结构特征的影响[J].轻工学报, 2019, 34(3):52-59.

    10. [10]

      秦梦彤, 胡婧, 李冠华.生物质生物预处理研究进展与展望[J].中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(5):85-91.

    11. [11]

      KANT B S, AHUJA V, CHANDEL N, et al.Advances in algal biomass pretreatment and its valorisation into biochemical and bioenergy by the microbial processes[J].Bioresource Technology, 2022, 358:127437.

    12. [12]

      DHARMARAJA J, SHOBANA S, ARVINDNARAYAN S, et al.Lignocellulosic biomass conversion via greener pretreatment methods towards biorefinery applications[J].Bioresource Technology, 2023, 369:128328.

    13. [13]

      NIU D Z, YU C Y, ZHENG M H, et al.Effects of ensiling on Irpex lacteus fermentation in wheat straw:Chemical composition, in vitro rumen digestibility, and fungal community[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2022, 292:115433.

    14. [14]

      SONG L L, YU H B, MA F Y, et al.Biological pretreatment under non-sterile conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover[J].Bioresources, 2013, 8(3):3802-3816.

    15. [15]

      BRETHAUER S, ROBERT L S, MICHAEL H S.Enhanced simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated beech wood by in situ treatment with the white rot fungus Irpex lacteus in a membrane aerated biofilm reactor[J].Bioresource Technology, 2017, 237:135-138.

    16. [16]

      DAVINIA S, ALICIA P, EUGENIA V M, et al.Sugar recoveries from wheat straw following treatments with the fungus Irpex lacteus[J].Bioresource Technology, 2013, 131:218-225.

    17. [17]

      MALACHOVA K, RYBKOVA Z, SEZIMOVA H, et al.Biodegradation and detoxification potential of rotating biological contactor (RBC) with Irpex lacteus for remediation of dye-containing wastewater[J].Water Research, 2013, 47(19):7143-7148.

    18. [18]

      王凯军, 石川, 刘越.有机固废厌氧发酵产物的转化制备与应用进展[J].环境工程学报, 2021, 15(6):1840-1861.

    19. [19]

      陈铭浩, 刘志豪, 王永红.凝结芽孢杆菌混合碳源乳酸发酵研究[J].食品工业科技, 2023, 44(6):155-161.

    20. [20]

      ZHANG Y M, CHEN X R, LUO J Q, et al.An efficient process for lactic acid production from wheat straw by a newly isolated Bacillus coagulans strain IPE22[J].Bioresource Technology, 2014, 158:396-399.

    21. [21]

      SLUITER A, HAMES B, RUIZ R, et al.Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass[J].Laboratory Analytical Procedure, 2008, 1617(1):1-16.

    22. [22]

      宋丽丽, 霍姗浩, 孙永威, 等.复合菌群协同发酵烟梗的降解特性及微生物多样性研究[J].轻工学报, 2023, 38(1):63-70.

    23. [23]

      JIANG S, XU P, TAO F.L-lactic acid production by Bacillus coagulans through simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulosic corncob residue[J].Bioresource Technology Reports, 2019, 6:131-137.

    24. [24]

      ZHAO L, ZHANG J Y, ZHAO D Y, et al.Biological degradation of lignin:A critical review on progress and perspectives[J].Industrial Crops and Products, 2022, 188:115715.

    25. [25]

      BASAK B, KUMAR R, BHARADWAJ S, et al.Advances in physicochemical pretreatment strategies for lignocellulose biomass and their effectiveness in bioconversion for biofuel productions[J].Bioresource Technology, 2023, 369:128413.

    26. [26]

      SINGH R, SINGH S, TRIMUKHE K D, et al.Lignin-carbohydrate complexes from sugarcane bagasse:Preparation, purification, and characterization[J].Carbohydrate Polymers, 2005, 62:57-66.

    27. [27]

      SCHMATZ A A, SALAZAR-BRYAM A M, CONTIERO J, et al.Pseudo-lignin content decreased with hemicellulose and lignin removal, improving cellulose accessibility, and enzymatic digestibility[J].Bioenergy Research, 2021, 14:106-121.

    28. [28]

      HIDALGO D, CASTRO J, DÍEZ D, et al.Torrefaction at low temperature as a promising pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass in anaerobic digestion[J].Energy, 2023, 263:125822.

    29. [29]

      BENITO-GONZÁLEZ I, JAÉN-CANO C M, LÓPEZ-RUBIO A, et al.Valorisation of vine shoots for the development of cellulose-based biocomposite films with improved performance and bioactivity[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 165:1540-1551.

    30. [30]

      MOONEY C A, MANSFIELD S D, TOUHY M G, et al.The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods[J].Bioresource Technology, 1998, 64(2):113-119.

    31. [31]

      解先利, 刘云云, 曹运齐, 等.木质纤维素酶水解分形动力学的研究进展[J].新能源进展, 2021, 9(5):426-433.

    32. [32]

      NIDETZKY B, STEINER W, HAYN M.Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw after steam pretreatment:Experimental data and kinetic modelling[J].Bioresource Technology, 1993, 44(1):25-32.

    33. [33]

      YANG B, WYMAN C E.BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2006, 94(4):611-61.

    34. [34]

      ROMANÍ A, TOMAZ P D, GARROTE G, et al.Combined alkali and hydrothermal pretreatments for oat straw valorization within a biorefinery concept[J].Bioresource Technology, 2016, 220:323-332.

    35. [35]

      余洪波. 三种类型木质纤维素的白腐菌降解异质性研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学, 2007.

    36. [36]

      RAWOOF S A A, KUMAR P S, VO D V N, et al.Production of optically pure lactic acid by microbial fermentation:A review[J].Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, 19:539-556.

    1. [1]

      丁心成孙瑞杰贾士儒侯颖 . 异源表达透明颤菌血红蛋白结合调控策略提高全细胞催化合成苯乳酸产量的研究. 轻工学报, 2026, 41(1): 69-80. doi: 10.12187/2026.01.007

    2. [2]

      张改红许航杜帅徐月莹石栋栋薛晶晶尚紫博毛多斌 . 麦芽酚-β-D-葡萄糖苷的稳定性及其在卷烟加香中的应用. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 102-108. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.012

    3. [3]

      胡仙妹于美逍杨雪鹏张展尹献忠 . 木醋杆菌和酿酒酵母混菌发酵对烟用细菌纤维素品质的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(6): 84-92. doi: 10.12187/2024.06.010

    4. [4]

      吴彦梁永伟薛云李天笑孙丽莉许春平徐志强 . 基于烟末和玫瑰混合提取的新型烟用香精及其应用研究. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(3): 56-64. doi: 10.12187/2025.03.007

    5. [5]

      周军黄俊清杜婷婷秦金梦张思威孙世彪孙新城 . 1株沙门氏菌噬菌体的分离鉴定及其抑菌效果研究. 轻工学报, 2026, 41(1): 59-68. doi: 10.12187/2026.01.006

    6. [6]

      卢晓波徐海朱俊召张宇谭健高冠男胡军华林龙 . 基于机器视觉的加热卷烟烟支端部质量检测系统设计. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.

    7. [7]

      卢晓波徐海朱俊召张宇谭健高冠男胡军华林龙 . 基于机器视觉的加热卷烟烟支端部质量检测系统设计. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(6): 101-107,115. doi: 10.12187/2024.06.012

    8. [8]

      赵金科崔华鹏徐海涛秦亚琼陈业娴刘雨刘瑞红刘绍锋 . 周向型加热卷烟烟芯段逐口热解过程的空间表征. 轻工学报, 2025, 0(0): -.

    9. [9]

      李伟泽王富申宗东岳曲利利刘寒池李嘉欣刘春奎许春平 . 基于美拉德反应的烟草浸膏烟用香料制备. 轻工学报, 2026, 41(2): 97-106. doi: 10.12187/2026.02.009

    10. [10]

      吴峤庄虎肖静淑周彬郝欣杨俊鹏王昊张敦铁 . 烟用醋酸纤维素基超轻气凝胶的构筑及表征. 轻工学报, 2026, 41(2): 126-132. doi: 10.12187/2026.02.012

    11. [11]

      黄朵朵王乐雷萍孙志伟李林洪张智轩黄锋李斌 . 基于烟芯段和滤嘴段耦合的加热卷烟烟气关键成分释放模型构建. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.

    12. [12]

      张新龙赵尔婉黄家乐冯媛于国锋许春平 . 基于美拉德反应的红茶茶末烟用香料的制备及加香效果研究. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(6): 57-69. doi: 10.12187/2024.06.007

    13. [13]

      黄朵朵王乐雷萍孙志伟李林洪张智轩黄锋李斌 . 基于烟芯段和滤嘴段耦合的加热卷烟烟气关键成分释放模型构建. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(6): 116-126. doi: 10.12187/2024.06.014

    14. [14]

      许克静刘语煊张展吕晶晶梁淼李瑞丽张峻松陈小龙 . 辊压法全烟梗再造烟叶的制备工艺优化及结构与性能分析. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(1): 64-74. doi: 10.12187/2025.01.008

    15. [15]

      张雷马永帅洪斌斌熊开胜徐大勇堵劲松李银华邹泉 . 一种改进OSELM算法在片烟复烤过程水分在线检测中的应用. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(3): 95-103. doi: 10.12187/2025.03.011

    16. [16]

      苏赞曹源孙建生胡志忠邹克兴刘鸿龙章德许春平 . 菌酶协同发酵前后低次烟叶香气差异性分析. 轻工学报, 2025, 0(0): -.

    17. [17]

      甘晓锟陈坤锥申迎宾张磊李湛 . 鹿茸菇多糖对免疫抑制小鼠免疫及肠道菌群的作用. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(6): 54-66. doi: 10.12187/2025.06.006

    18. [18]

      王祯许怡娟刘晨宋凯魏进彬臧志鹏胡威毛多斌 . 基于宏基因组学技术的发酵陕西烟叶混合菌开发. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(6): 87-97. doi: 10.12187/2025.06.009

    19. [19]

      苏赞曹源孙建生胡志忠邹克兴刘鸿龙章德许春平 . 菌酶协同发酵前后低次烟叶香气差异性分析. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(6): 77-86. doi: 10.12187/2025.06.008

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  16
  • 文章访问数:  6222
  • 引证文献数: 0
文章相关
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-03
  • 修回日期:  2023-05-27
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
宋丽丽, 霍姗浩, 冯梦琪, 等. 乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011
引用本文: 宋丽丽, 霍姗浩, 冯梦琪, 等. 乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011
SONG Lili, HUO Shanhao, FENG Mengqi, et al. Effect of pretreatment with Irpex lacteus on lactic acid production from tobacco stalks[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011
Citation: SONG Lili, HUO Shanhao, FENG Mengqi, et al. Effect of pretreatment with Irpex lacteus on lactic acid production from tobacco stalks[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(6): 85-92. doi: 10.12187/2023.06.011

乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆发酵产乳酸的影响

    作者简介:宋丽丽(1987-),女,河南省信阳市人,郑州轻工业大学讲师,博士,主要研究方向为烟草生物技术。E-mail:sll@zzuli.edu.cn
  • 郑州轻工业大学 食品与生物工程学院, 河南 郑州 450001
基金项目:  国家自然科学基金项目(21706244);河南省科技攻关项目(222102320331,232102321144,232102110150)

摘要: 针对烟秆结构致密、尼古丁抑制作用强及纤维质糖类物质转化效率低等问题,采用乳白耙菌预处理烟秆,比较预处理前后烟秆组分和结构变化,研究乳白耙菌预处理对烟秆酶解糖化效果的影响,并进一步比较不同发酵方式下(同步糖化发酵、分批发酵)凝结芽孢杆菌发酵烟秆后乳酸的转化率。结果表明:经乳白耙菌预处理20 d后,烟秆中木质素质量分数较原料烟秆降低了44.90%,乳白耙菌可选择性地破坏木质素大分子结构,木质素苯环及侧链基团均存在不同程度的降解;乳白耙菌预处理后的烟秆纤维素可反应性提升,葡萄糖的产量为260 mg/g,较原料烟秆提高了2.25倍;相较于分批发酵,同步糖化发酵的乳酸产量较高(392.16 mg/g),乳酸转化率达到86.95%,较原料烟秆提高了3.78倍。乳白耙菌预处理可选择性降解烟秆木质素,降低烟秆酶解糖化抗性,提升烟秆乳酸的转化率。

English Abstract

参考文献 (36) 相关文章 (19)

目录

/

返回文章