不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响

张晓晴; 潘俊坤; 吕真真; 刘杰超; 焦中高

doi:10.12187/2025.01.001

不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响

中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所, 河南郑州 450009

作者简介: 张晓晴(1995—),女,河南省安阳市人,中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所助理研究员,主要研究方向为果品加工。E-mail:82101185205@caas.cn;

通讯作者: 刘杰超,liujiechao@caas.cn

基金项目: 中国农业科学院科技创新工程专项项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2021-ZFRI)
河南省重点研发与推广专项(科技攻关)项目(232102110148)
中图分类号: TS255.4

Quality characteristics of peach wine as affected by different pretreatment techniques

Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450009, China

Corresponding author: LIU Jiechao, liujiechao@caas.cn

Received Date: 2024-07-07
Accepted Date: 2024-09-20

CLC number: TS255.4

摘要: 以春蜜桃为原料,分别采用带皮制浆、去皮制浆和带皮制浆后酶解取汁3种前处理工艺制汁(浆)后发酵酿制桃果酒,通过测定其色泽、理化指标、酚类物质组成及含量、挥发性香气成分组成及质量浓度等,研究不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响。结果表明:带皮制浆发酵酿制的桃果酒具有较高的总酚和总黄酮含量,但酒液黄色更深,高级醇总含量达640.00 mg/L,严重超出果酒高级醇含量的理想范围(300~400 mg/L)。去皮制浆发酵酿制的桃果酒可较好地保留春蜜桃果肉的绿色,且高级醇含量降低至357.79 mg/L,但相较带皮制浆酿制的桃果酒,总酚含量、抗氧化活性和挥发性香气成分总质量浓度分别降低了11.55%、11.60%和42.86%。带皮制浆后酶解取汁发酵酿制的桃果酒的亮度值和抗氧化活性均有所提高,高级醇含量降低至403.11 mg/L,总酚、原儿茶酸、绿原酸、原花青素C1和异鼠李素含量高于去皮制浆发酵酿制的桃果酒,且相较带皮制浆和去皮制浆发酵酿制的桃果酒,挥发性香气成分总质量浓度分别增加了25.50%和119.66%,酯类挥发性香气成分总质量浓度分别增加了1.02倍和3.80倍,且较好地保留了桃果实的香气特征成分丙位癸内酯。因此,带皮制浆后酶解取汁是生产高品质桃果酒的一种较优前处理工艺。
- 桃果酒 /
- 前处理工艺 /
- 高级醇 /
- 挥发性香气成分 /
- 酚类物质
Abstract: In order to investigate the effects of different pretreatment techniques of peach fruit on the quality characteristics of peach wine, peach wines were prepared by different pretreatments with Chunmi peach fruit, including pulping with skin, pulping with peeling fruit, and extracting juice by enzymolysis after pulping with whole fruit, and then the color, physicochemical indexes, composition and content of phenolic substances, composition and mass concentration of volatile aroma components of the wines were determined. Results showed that pulping with whole fruit resulted in a peach wine with higher content of total phenolics and flavonoids, but the yellow color of the wine was enhanced, and the content of higher alcohols in the final wine achieved as high as 640 mg/L, significantly exceeding the ideal range (300~400 mg/L)of higher alcohols in fruit wine. Pulping with peeling fruit could effectively retain the green color of Chunmi peach fruit flesh and reduce the content of higher alcohols to 357.79 mg/L, but the total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and total mass concentration of volatile aroma components were also reduced by 11.55%, 11.60% and 42.86% as compared with pulping with whole fruit. Peach wine fermented with extracted juice by enzymolysis after pulping with whole fruit showed the highest brightness value and antioxidant activity, and the content of higher alcohols was reduced to 403.11 mg/L. Furthermore, the contents of total phenolics, protocatechuic acid, chlorogenic acid, procyanidin C1, isorhamnetin in the peach wine fermented with extracted juice by enzymolysis after pulping with whole fruit were higher than pulping with peeled fruit. The total mass concentration of volatile aroma components of peach wine fermented with extracted juice by enzymolysis after pulping with whole fruit were 25.50% and 119.66% higher than those of pulping with whole fruit and pulping with peeling fruit, and the total mass concentration of esters was 1.02 and 3.80 times higher than those of pulping with whole fruit and pulping with peeling fruit. The γ-decalactone, which was the characteristic aroma compound of peach fruit, was better retained by pretreatment of extracting juice by enzymolysis after pulping with whole fruit. It was suggested that extracting juice by enzymolysis after pulping with whole fruit was a promising pretreatment technique for producing peach wine of high quality.
- peach wine /
- pretreatment technique /
- higher alcohol /
- volatile aroma component /
- phenolic substance
1. [1]
  CAI W C,TANG F X,SHAN C H,et al.Pretreatment methods affecting the color,flavor,bioactive compounds,and antioxidant activity of jujube wine[J].Food Science & Nutrition,2020,8(9):4965-4975.
2. [2]
  陈红梅,王沙沙,尹何南,等.不同工艺处理对野生猕猴桃酒品质的影响[J].食品科学,2018,39(4):233-240.
3. [3]
  付勋,聂青玉,张文玲,等.不同前处理工艺红桔果汁与红桔果酒挥发性风味物质分析[J].中国酿造,2024,43(5):81-90.
4. [4]
  于海燕,钱新华,陈臣,等.黄桃酒发酵过程中风味物质的变化[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(14):87-93.
5. [5]
  刘沁源,吴祖芳,翁佩芳.水蜜桃酒速酿酵母菌的筛选、鉴定及发酵条件优化[J].核农学报,2020,34(7):1480-1490.
6. [6]
  李明瑕,刘春凤,王壬,等.黄桃果酒酿酒酵母的筛选与发酵特性分析[J].食品与发酵工业,2021,47(14):113-122.
7. [7]
  LIU C F,LI M X,REN T,et al.Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces strains on alcoholic fermentation behavior and aroma profile of yellow-fleshed peach wine[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology,2022,155:112993.
8. [8]
  马宁原,姚凌云,孙敏,等.基于GC-IMS和GC-MS分析不同发酵方式对黄桃酒香气成分的影响[J].食品科学,2023,44(12):306-314.
9. [9]
  LIU Q Y,WENG P F,WU Z F.Quality and aroma characteristics of honey peach wines as influenced by different maturity[J].International Journal of Food Properties,2020,23(1):445-458.
10. [10]
  张晓晴,吕真真,刘慧,等.不同品种桃果酒品质特性与酿酒适宜性评价[J].果树学报,2021,38(8):1368-1380.
11. [11]
  国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.葡萄酒、果酒通用分析方法:GB/T 15038—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
12. [12]
  中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.蒸馏酒与配制酒卫生标准的分析方法:GB/T 5009.48—2003[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
13. [13]
  费永涛,刘东杰,罗子淳,等.植物乳杆菌R-1对发酵柠檬果汁风味和营养物质的影响[J].轻工学报,2024,39(3):29-37
  ,53.
14. [14]
  张明君,李迎秋.牡丹籽酱油的制备及其抗氧化活性研究[J].轻工学报,2023,38(4):53-60.
15. [15]
  葛正凯,黄倩,李洁,等.不同抗氧化剂对白葡萄酒品质的影响[J].中国酿造,2020,39(10):136-144.
16. [16]
  DE ESCALADA PLA M F,GONZÁLEZ P,SETTE P,et al.Effect of processing on physico-chemical characteristics of dietary fibre concentrates obtained from peach (Prunus persica L.) peel and pulp[J].Food Research International,2012,49(1):184-192.
17. [17]
  PATHAK P D, MANDAVGANE S A,KULKARNI B D.Fruit peel waste as a novel low-cost bio adsorbent[J].Reviews in Chemical Engineering,2015,31(4):361-381.
18. [18]
  张香,秦丹,曾璐,等.发酵型果酒中甲醇和杂醇油的研究进展[J].中国酿造,2020,39(8):17-21.
19. [19]
  张文叶,吴庆伟,吴刚,等.氨基酸种类与添加量对山楂酒中主要高级醇生成量的影响[J].轻工学报,2017,32(3):1-7.
20. [20]
  CAMELEYRE M,LYTRA G,TEMPERE S,et al.Olfactory impact of higher alcohols on red wine fruity ester aroma expression in model solution[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2015,63(44):9777-9788.
21. [21]
  ANCÍN C,AYESTARÁN B,CORROZA M,et al.Influence of prefermentation clarification on the higher alcohol contents of wines[J].Food Chemistry,1996,55(3):241-249.
22. [22]
  王永辉,张振华,金宏,等.锦灯笼果不同部位氨基酸的测定与分析[J].氨基酸和生物资源,2009,31(1):81-83.
23. [23]
  TIAN B,HARRISON R,MORTONJ,et al.Influence of skin contact and different extractants on extraction of proteins and phenolic substances in Sauvignon Blanc grape skin[J].Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research,2020,26(2):180-186.
24. [24]
  GUTIÉRREZ-ESCOBAR R,ALIAÑO-GONZÁLEZ M J,CANTOS-VILLAR E.Wine polyphenol content and its influence on wine quality and properties: A review[J].Molecules,2021,26(3):718.
25. [25]
  LIU H,CAO J K,JIANG W B.Evaluation and comparison of vitamin C,phenolic compounds,antioxidant properties and metal chelating activity of pulp and peel from selected peach cultivars[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology,2015,63(2):1042-1048.
26. [26]
  SAIDANI F,GIMÉNEZ R,AUBERT C,et al.Phenolic,sugar and acid profiles and the antioxidant composition in the peel and pulp of peach fruits[J].Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2017,62:126-133.
27. [27]
  王沙沙,陈红梅,董喆,等.不同工艺对'关口’葡萄干白葡萄酒品质的影响[J].食品科学,2017,38(21):138-145.
28. [28]
  DUCASSE M A,CANAL-LLAUBERES R M,DE LUMLEY M,et al.Effect of macerating enzyme treatment on the polyphenol and polysaccharide composition of red wines[J].Food Chemistry,2010,118(2):369-376.
29. [29]
  WEI X H,HAO J,XIONG K X,et al.Effect of pectinase produced by Bacillus velezensis W17-6 on methanol content and overall quality of kiwifruit wine[J].Food Bioscience,2024,59:104180.
30. [30]
  ZHAO W Y,WANG L M,CHUAI P B,et al.The effects of cold pectinase maceration and pulp juice fermentation on physicochemical properties of raspberry wine[J].Journal of Food Processing and Preservation,2022,46(9):e16646.
31. [31]
  LIU M M,YANG K,QI Y M,et al.Physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of persimmon wine by technology of pectinase addition and different pre-macerations[J].Journal of Food Processing and Preservation,2018,42(2):e13452.
32. [32]
  LIU J C,YANG W B,LV Z Z,et al.Effects of different pretreatments on physicochemical properties and phenolic compounds of hawthorn wine[J].CyTA-Journal of Food,2020,18(1):518-526.
33. [33]
  JIANG X H,LU Y Y,LIU S Q.Effects of pectinase treatment on the physicochemical and oenological properties of red dragon fruit wine fermented with Torulaspora delbrueckii[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology,2020,132:109929.
34. [34]
  CHOI K T,LEE S B,CHOI J S,et al.Influence of different pretreatments and chaptalization types on the physiological characteristics and antioxidant activity of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) wine[J].Italian Journal of Food Science,2020,32(4):912-927.
35. [35]
  PENG B,YU M L,ZHANG B B,et al.Differences in PpAAT1 activity in high- and low-aroma peach varieties affect γ-decalactone production[J].Plant Physiology,2020,182(4):2065-2080.
36. [36]
  AUBERT C,MILHET C.Distribution of the volatile compounds in the different parts of a white-fleshed peach (Prunus persica L.Batsch)[J].Food Chemistry,2007,102(1):375-384.
37. [37]
  JIA H J,OKAMOTO G.Distribution of volatile compounds in peach fruit[J].Engei Gakkai Zasshi,2001,70(2):223-225.
38. [38]
  吕佳玮,刘亚琼,路瑶,等.原料预处理对柿子酒发酵过程中挥发性风味物质的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2020,41(12):61-69.
39. [39]
  杨旭,陈亮,辛秀兰,等.果汁发酵和带渣发酵蓝靛果酒香气成分分析[J].食品科学,2014,35(12):115-119.
40. [40]
  STYGER G,PRIOR B,BAUER F F.Wine flavor and aroma[J].Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology,2011,38(9):1145-1159.
41. [41]
  BURIN V M,CALIARI V,BORDIGNON-LUIZ M T.Nitrogen compounds in must and volatile profile of white wine: Influence of clarification process before alcoholic fermentation[J].Food Chemistry,2016,202:417-425.
42. [42]
  周雪艳,赵一凡,张晓腾,等.不同发酵方式对鸭梨酒香气成分的影响[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(21):241-247
  ,257.
1. [1]
  张丽华 , 陈云莉 , 石勇 , 李顺峰 , 查蒙蒙 , 李昌文 , 纵伟 , 王小媛 . 植物乳杆菌发酵对红枣汁挥发性香气成分的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
2. [2]
  杨鹏飞 , 吴薇 , 孙海峰 , 刘龑章 , 尚紫博 , 薛晶晶 , 许志杰 , 宋梦坤 . GC-MS结合多元统计分析研究两种工艺提取的脐橙挥发性成分差异. 轻工学报, 2025, 0(0): -.
3. [3]
  张改红 , 许航 , 杜帅 , 徐月莹 , 石栋栋 , 薛晶晶 , 尚紫博 , 毛多斌 . 麦芽酚-β-D-葡萄糖苷的稳定性及其在卷烟加香中的应用. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 102-108. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.012
4. [4]
  楚文娟 , 郭丽霞 , 程东旭 , 王红霞 , 崔廷 , 冯银龙 , 王建民 , 鲁平 . 基于K-means聚类及模糊判别的卷烟包灰性能综合评价方法. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(6): 93-100. doi: 10.12187/2024.06.011
5. [5]
  李文瀚 , 刘紫韫 , 姜瑜倩 , 李喜宏 , 班兆军 . 臭氧处理对红灯樱桃保鲜效果的影响. 轻工学报, 2025, 0(0): -.
6. [6]
  贾尚羲 , 张怡雪 , 石盼盼 , 王昱 , 李可 . 不同时长超声波处理对鹰嘴豆分离蛋白乳化液稳定性的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 40-49. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.005
7. [7]
  吕金羚 , 傅亮 , 陈永生 . 红茶-花生蛋白复合饮品工艺优化及其营养特性研究. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
8. [8]
  吕金羚 , 傅亮 , 陈永生 . 红茶-花生蛋白复合饮品工艺优化及其营养特性研究. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(5): 9-17. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.002
9. [9]
  曾强 , 阙文豪 , 许璧麟 , 于静 , 王昭焜 , 张尧立 , 张炜 , 董文亮 . 薄板烘丝机筒内结垢程度对设备工艺性能的影响. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(1): 58-63. doi: 10.12187/2025.01.007
10. [10]
  倪众 , 楚鹏飞 , 林颖 , 刘玉欣 . 低温长时间热处理过程中氧化和加热对海参体壁胶原纤维结构的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
11. [11]
  倪众 , 楚鹏飞 , 林颖 , 刘玉欣 . 低温长时间热处理过程中氧化和加热对海参体壁胶原纤维结构的影响. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(1): 21-31,57. doi: 10.12187/2025.01.003
12. [12]
  池哲翔 , 廖敏 , 史尚 , 李声毅 , 廖芸 , 丁冬 . 国外烟草活性成分提取及纤维材料利用现状与展望. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
13. [13]
  冯永新 , 崔英 , 李科都 , 张腾健 , 卢敏瑞 , 王芳 , 杨阳 , 李萌 . 打辊工艺对翠碧一号上部烟叶打叶质量和出片率的影响. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(1): 82-89. doi: 10.12187/2025.01.010
14. [14]
  许克静 , 刘语煊 , 张展 , 吕晶晶 , 梁淼 , 李瑞丽 , 张峻松 , 陈小龙 . 辊压法全烟梗再造烟叶的制备工艺优化及结构与性能分析. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(1): 64-74. doi: 10.12187/2025.01.008
15. [15]
  黄朵朵 , 王乐 , 雷萍 , 孙志伟 , 李林洪 , 张智轩 , 黄锋 , 李斌 . 基于烟芯段和滤嘴段耦合的加热卷烟烟气关键成分释放模型构建. 轻工学报, 2024, 0(0): -.
16. [16]
  黄朵朵 , 王乐 , 雷萍 , 孙志伟 , 李林洪 , 张智轩 , 黄锋 , 李斌 . 基于烟芯段和滤嘴段耦合的加热卷烟烟气关键成分释放模型构建. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(6): 116-126. doi: 10.12187/2024.06.014
17. [17]
  吴启贤 , 陈子杰 , 崔要强 , 伍锦鸣 , 赵谋明 , 任胜超 , 冯云子 . 不同产地烟叶碱提香料卷烟加香效果及化学成分差异分析. 轻工学报, 2025, 40(1): 98-106,119. doi: 10.12187/2025.01.012

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 3
文章访问数: 95
引证文献数: 0

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响

作者简介: 张晓晴(1995—),女,河南省安阳市人,中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所助理研究员,主要研究方向为果品加工。E-mail:82101185205@caas.cn;

通讯作者: 刘杰超,liujiechao@caas.cn

Quality characteristics of peach wine as affected by different pretreatment techniques

Corresponding author: LIU Jiechao, liujiechao@caas.cn

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响

作者简介:张晓晴(1995—),女,河南省安阳市人,中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所助理研究员,主要研究方向为果品加工。E-mail:82101185205@caas.cn

通讯作者: 刘杰超, liujiechao@caas.cn

English Abstract

Quality characteristics of peach wine as affected by different pretreatment techniques

Corresponding author: LIU Jiechao, liujiechao@caas.cn

目录

不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响

作者简介: 张晓晴(1995—),女,河南省安阳市人,中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所助理研究员,主要研究方向为果品加工。E-mail:82101185205@caas.cn;

通讯作者: 刘杰超,liujiechao@caas.cn

Quality characteristics of peach wine as affected by different pretreatment techniques

Corresponding author: LIU Jiechao, liujiechao@caas.cn

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

不同前处理工艺对桃果酒品质的影响

作者简介:张晓晴(1995—),女,河南省安阳市人,中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所助理研究员,主要研究方向为果品加工。E-mail:82101185205@caas.cn

通讯作者: 刘杰超, liujiechao@caas.cn

English Abstract

Quality characteristics of peach wine as affected by different pretreatment techniques

Corresponding author: LIU Jiechao, liujiechao@caas.cn

目录