国外概念整合研究的新动态与趋势展望

杨波 ,  卞京

downloadPDF
引用本文: 杨波, 卞京. 国外概念整合研究的新动态与趋势展望[J]. 郑州轻工业大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 25(5): 25-36. doi: 10.12186/2024.05.004
shu

国外概念整合研究的新动态与趋势展望

  • 1. 东南大学 外国语学院, 江苏 南京 211189;

  • 2. 南京师范大学 外国语学院, 江苏 南京 210024

    • 作者简介: 杨波(1980—),男,四川省泸州市人,东南大学副研究员,博士,主要研究方向:认知语言学、批评话语分析;卞京(1991—),男,江苏省溧阳市人,南京师范大学讲师,博士,主要研究方向:认知语言学、神经语言学。;

  • 基金项目: 江苏省社科基金项目(21YYB006)
    江苏省社科基金青年项目(20YYC012)

  • 中图分类号: H030

New developments and trends in conceptual integration research abroad

  • Received Date: 2023-11-28

    CLC number: H030

  • 摘要: 概念整合既是认知语言学研究中的热点,也是认知语言学和其他学科领域研究的结合点。自21世纪初以来,国外概念整合研究既包括传统的6个方面的理论及其应用研究,也包括在认知语言学量化转向和社会转向的背景下概念整合与神经语言学和心理语言学研究、多模态和手语研究、数学和计算建模研究,以及与音乐作曲及其他学科领域的新兴交叉融合研究。这些研究成果揭示了人类的思维方式,也对更多的概念整合应用研究的开展起到了积极的示范、参考作用。同时,概念整合理论尚存在以下挑战:一是该理论尚不完备,二是能够展示整合运作机制的神经和心理测试方法尚不明确,三是人们尚未能够对概念整合进行算法编程。基于此,概念整合研究的未来发展路径和方向为:一是针对概念整合理论的不完备和遭到的质疑,继续改进和完善概念整合理论及其框架;二是揭示更多包括语言在内的人类生活种种现象和行为之“表”及其背后的概念整合之“里”的关系;三是探究概念整合运作的创造性,发掘概念整合的创造力;四是在人类概念化的层面探究概念整合运作的心理过程的描写及其验证方法;五是积极利用和开发生理、神经等技术手段窥探概念整合运作的生理、神经基础和机制;六是继续推进概念整合的算法编程(或计算建模)研究及其在现有的数学、音乐、设计、多模态等之外更多领域的研究和应用。
    1. [1]

      DIRVEN R.Major strands in cognitive linguistics[M]//RUIZ DE MENDOZA F J,PENA CERVEL M S.Cognitive linguistics:Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2005:17-68.

    2. [2]

      GONZALEZ-MARQUEZ M,MITTELBER I,COULSON S,et al.Methods in Cognitive Linguistics[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2007.

    3. [3]

      张辉,杨波.心理空间与概念整合:理论发展及其应用[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2008,31(1):7-14.

    4. [4]

      EVANS V,GREEN M.Cognitive linguistics:An introduction[M].Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press,2006.

    5. [5]

      王正元.概念整合理论的发展与理论前沿[J].四川外语学院学报,2006,22(6):65-70.

    6. [6]

      FAUCONNIER G,TURNER M.The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities[M].New York:Basic Books,2002:ⅪⅤ.

    7. [7]

      CONFALONIERI R,EPPE M,SCHORLEMMER M,et al.Upward refinement operators for conceptual blending in the description logic εL++[J].Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,2018(82):69-99.

    8. [8]

      PAPP K.A conceptual integration approach to the property word nagy “big” [J].Acta Linguistica Hungarica,2010,57(1):119-142.

    9. [9]

      BONIFAZI A.Mental-space account of embedded viewpoint for anaphoric constructions countering coreference rules[EB/OL].(2023-08-07)[2023-11-01].https://hartmast.github.io/iclc16/abstracts/ICLC16_paper_279.pdf.

    10. [10]

      OAKLEY T,CRISP P.Honeymoons and pilgrimages:Conceptual integration and allegory in old and new media[J].Metaphor and Symbol,2011,26(2):152-159.

    11. [11]

      SCHRζÖDER U.Applying conceptual metaphor and blending theory to culture-specific speech functions in rap lyrics[J].Text & Talk,2012,32 (2):211-233.

    12. [12]

      VAN KRIEKEN K,SANDERS J.Smoothly moving through mental spaces:Linguistic patterns of viewpoint transfer in news narratives[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2019,30(3):499-529.

    13. [13]

      JOHNSTONE C.The future is now:Blending theory and the reconfiguration of the climate crisis[EB/OL].(2023-08-07)[2023-11-01].https://iclc16.github.io/abstracts/ICLC16_paper_575.pdf.

    14. [14]

      SCHILPEROORD J.Raising the issue:A mental-space approach to lwo jima-inspired editorial cartoons[J].Metaphor and Symbol,2013,28 (3):185-212.

    15. [15]

      GROGAN K.Climate change discourse:Blending and viewpoint in multimodal artifacts[EB/OL].(2023-04-07)[2023-11-01].https://iclc16.phil.hhu.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ICLC16_paper_452.pdf.

    16. [16]

      WILSON K.Reconciling layers of discourse in Dungeons & Dragons through the discourse viewpoint space[EB/OL].(2023-08-07)[2023-11-01].https://iclc16.github.io/abstracts/ICLC16_paper_548.pdf.

    17. [17]

      JANZEN T,SHAFFER B,LEESON L.Blended spaces in simultaneous interpreting:Signers’ and gesturers’ subjective representations of speakers’ texts[EB/OL].(2023-08-07)[2023-11-01].https://iclc16.phil.hhu.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ICLC16_paper_435.pdf.

    18. [18]

      SAUNDERS D,PARISOT A M.Insights on the use of narrative perspectives in signed and spoken discourse in Quebec sign language,American sign language,and Quebec French[M]//JANZEN T,SHAFFER B.Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics.Berlin,Boston:De Gruyter Mouton,2023:243-272.

    19. [19]

      SWEETSER E.Blending spaces to compose speech and gesture meaning[EB/OL].(2023-08-07)[2023-11-01].https://hartmast.github.io/iclc16/abstracts/ICLC16_paper_426.pdf.

    20. [20]

      COULSON S.Semantic leaps:Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.

    21. [21]

      COULSON S,VAN PETTEN C.Conceptual integration and metaphor:An event-related potential study[J].Memory and Cognition,2002,30(6):958-968.

    22. [22]

      GRUSH R,MANDELBLIT N.Blending in language,conceptual structure and the cerebral cortex[EB/OL].(2003-06-15)[2022-02-16].http://markturner.org/blending.

    23. [23]

      WALLENTIN M,WEED E, ØSTERGAARD L,et al.Accessing the mental space-spatial working memory processes for language and vision overlap in precuneus[J].Human Brain Mapping,2008,29(5):524-532.

    24. [24]

      YANG F P G,BRADLEY K,HUQ M,et al.Contextual effects on conceptual blending in metaphors:An event-related potential study[J].Journal of Neurolinguistics,2013,26(2):312-326.

    25. [25]

      SINHA C.Blending out of the background:Play,props and staging in the material world[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2005,37(10):1537-1554.

    26. [26]

      STINE-MORROW E A,NOH S R,SHAKE M C.Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing[J].Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2010,63(7):1430-1455.

    27. [27]

      GAO X,LEVINTHAL B R,STINE-MORROW E A.The effects of ageing and visual noise on conceptual integration during sentence reading[J].Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2012,65(9):1833-1847.

    28. [28]

      KLEIJN S,MAK W M,SANDERS T J.Causality,subjectivity and mental spaces:Insights from on-line discourse processing[J].Cognitive Linguistics,2021,32(1):35-65.

    29. [29]

      GUHE M,PEASE A,SMAILL A,et al.A computational account of conceptual blending in basic mathematics[J].Cognitive Systems Research,2011,12(3/4):249-265.

    30. [30]

      GUTHORMSEN A M,FISHER K J,BASSOK M,et al.Conceptual integration of arithmetic operations with real-world knowledge:Evidence from event-related potentials[J].Cognitive Science,2016,40(3):723-757.

    31. [31]

      SCHORLEMMER M,PLAZA E.A uniform model of computational conceptual blending[J].Cognitive Systems Research,2021,65:118-137.

    32. [32]

      PEREIRA F C.Creativity and artificial intelligence:A conceptual blending approach[M].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2007.

    33. [33]

      HEDBLOM M M,KUTZ O,NEUHAUS F.Image schemas in computational conceptual blending[J].Cognitive Systems Research,2016,39:42-57.

    34. [34]

      CONFALONIERI R,EPPE M,MACLEAN E,et al.A computational framework for conceptual blending[J].Artificial Intelligence,2018,256:105-129.

    35. [35]

      KARIMI P,MAHER M L,DAVIS N,et al.Deep learning in a computational model for conceptual shifts in a co-creative design system[EB/OL].(2019-06-24)[2023-10-26].https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.10188.

    36. [36]

      MARTINS P,OLIVEIRA H G,GON&3199；ALVES J C,et al.Computational creativity infrastructure for online software composition:A conceptual blending use case[J].Journal of Research and Development,2019,63(1):1-17.

    37. [37]

      FALOMIR Z,PLAZA E.Towards a model of creative understanding:Deconstructing and recreating conceptual blends using image schemas and qualitative spatial descriptors[J].Ann Math Artif Intell,2020,88(5):457-477.

    38. [38]

      TURNER M.The literary mind[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1996.

    39. [39]

      TURNER M.The artful mind:Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2006:93-113.

    40. [40]

      ZACHARAKIS A,KALIAKATSOS-PAPAKOSTAS M,TSOUGRAS C,et al.Creating musical cadences via conceptual blending:Empirical evaluation and enhancement of a formal model[J].Music Perception,2017,35(2):211-234.

    41. [41]

      ATHANASOPOULOS G,ANTOVIĆ M.Conceptual integration of sound and image:A model of perceptual modalities[J].Musicae Scientiae,2018,22(1):72-87.

    42. [42]

      ZBIKOWSKI L M.Conceptual blending,creativity,and music[J].Musicae Scientiae,2018,22(1):6-23.

    43. [43]

      SPITZER M.Conceptual blending and musical emotion[J].Musicae Scientiae,2018,22 (1):24-37.

    44. [44]

      ANTOVIĆ M.Schemas,grounds,meaning:On the emergence of musical concepts through conceptual blending[J].Musicae Scientiae,2018,22 (1):57-71.

    45. [45]

      KALIAKATSOS-PAPAKOSTAS M,CAMBOUROPOULOS E.Conceptual blending of high-level features and data-driven salience computation in melodic generation[J].Cognitive Systems Research,2019,58:55-70.

    46. [46]

      BESADA J L,BARTHEL-CALVET A S,C&3193;NOVAS C P.Gearing time toward musical creativity:Conceptual integration and material anchoring in Xenakis’ Psappha[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2021(11):611316.

    47. [47]

      C&3193;NOVAS C P,TEUSCHER U.Much more than money:Conceptual integration and the materialization of time in Michael Ende’s Momo and the social sciences[J].Pragmatics & Cognition,2012,20(3):546-569.

    48. [48]

      TURNER M.Blending in language and communication[M]//DABROWSKA E,DIVJAK D.Cognitive Linguistics-Foundations of Language.Berlin,Boston:Walter De Gruyter,2019.

    49. [49]

      TURNER M.Compression and decompression in mathematics[M]//DANESI M.Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Math Cognition.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2019:1-24.

    50. [50]

      杨波,TURNER M.Gilles Fauconnier教授的遗产:从心理空间到概念整合及其他[J].外语研究,2022,39(5):27-33.

    1. [1]

      孙毅 , 梁泽贤 . “腿(leg)”隐喻在汉英表达中的认知语言学阐析. 郑州轻工业大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 25(5): 17-24. doi: 10.12186/2024.05.003

    2. [2]

      宋鸿立 , 宋雨倩 . 多模态文化隐喻框架下文明互鉴理念的视像化构建及其软传播研究——以纪录片《穿越丝路双城记》为例. 郑州轻工业大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 25(5): 37-48. doi: 10.12186/2024.05.005

    3. [3]

      杨梦欣 , 王浩斌 . 马克思资本批判的三重向度及其当代价值——以《1844年经济学哲学手稿》为中心的考察. 郑州轻工业大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 25(6): 26-33. doi: 10.12186/2024.06.004

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 文章访问数:  1643
  • 引证文献数: 0
文章相关
  • 收稿日期:  2023-11-28
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

国外概念整合研究的新动态与趋势展望

    作者简介:杨波(1980—),男,四川省泸州市人,东南大学副研究员,博士,主要研究方向:认知语言学、批评话语分析;卞京(1991—),男,江苏省溧阳市人,南京师范大学讲师,博士,主要研究方向:认知语言学、神经语言学。
  • 1. 东南大学 外国语学院, 江苏 南京 211189;
  • 2. 南京师范大学 外国语学院, 江苏 南京 210024
  • 收稿日期: 2023-11-28
基金项目:  江苏省社科基金项目(21YYB006)江苏省社科基金青年项目(20YYC012)

摘要: 概念整合既是认知语言学研究中的热点,也是认知语言学和其他学科领域研究的结合点。自21世纪初以来,国外概念整合研究既包括传统的6个方面的理论及其应用研究,也包括在认知语言学量化转向和社会转向的背景下概念整合与神经语言学和心理语言学研究、多模态和手语研究、数学和计算建模研究,以及与音乐作曲及其他学科领域的新兴交叉融合研究。这些研究成果揭示了人类的思维方式,也对更多的概念整合应用研究的开展起到了积极的示范、参考作用。同时,概念整合理论尚存在以下挑战:一是该理论尚不完备,二是能够展示整合运作机制的神经和心理测试方法尚不明确,三是人们尚未能够对概念整合进行算法编程。基于此,概念整合研究的未来发展路径和方向为:一是针对概念整合理论的不完备和遭到的质疑,继续改进和完善概念整合理论及其框架;二是揭示更多包括语言在内的人类生活种种现象和行为之“表”及其背后的概念整合之“里”的关系;三是探究概念整合运作的创造性,发掘概念整合的创造力;四是在人类概念化的层面探究概念整合运作的心理过程的描写及其验证方法;五是积极利用和开发生理、神经等技术手段窥探概念整合运作的生理、神经基础和机制;六是继续推进概念整合的算法编程(或计算建模)研究及其在现有的数学、音乐、设计、多模态等之外更多领域的研究和应用。


参考文献 (50)

目录

/

返回文章

版权所有 © 郑州轻工业大学学报编辑部

地址：河南省郑州市科学大道136号    邮编：450001

本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发 技术支持： info@rhhz.net