JOURNAL OF LIGHT INDUSTRY

CN 41-1437/TS  ISSN 2096-1553

Volume 35 Issue 3
May 2020
Article Contents
ZHOU Wei, DU Hongyi, SUN Lanxi, et al. Analysis of flavor components in flue-cured tobacco leaves of suitable storage period in Chongqing tobacco-growing areas[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2020, 35(3): 60-71. doi: 10.12187/2020.03.008
Citation: ZHOU Wei, DU Hongyi, SUN Lanxi, et al. Analysis of flavor components in flue-cured tobacco leaves of suitable storage period in Chongqing tobacco-growing areas[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2020, 35(3): 60-71. doi: 10.12187/2020.03.008 shu

Analysis of flavor components in flue-cured tobacco leaves of suitable storage period in Chongqing tobacco-growing areas

  • Received Date: 2019-12-16
  • SDE-GC-MS was used to determine the content of flavor components in flue-cured tobacco leaves of suitable storage period in Chongqing tobacco-growing areas, and descriptive statistical analysis was carried out for the determined flavor components. Principal component analysis was used to screen the characteristic indexes of flavor components, and the difference significance analysis, multiple comparison and cluster analysis were carried out for the selected characteristic indexes. The results showed that there were significant differences in the content of 63 flavor components in tobacco leaves, and the variation coefficients of flavor components in upper and middle tobacco leaves were 12.12%~59.97% and 10.41%~73.25% respectively. There were significant differences in the region, aged time, cultivar, and grade of tobacco leaves, and the influence degree of different factors were region>aged time>cultivar>grade, but there was almost no significant difference among the grades within the position. Characteristic index content of flavor components in upper tobacco leaves of Fengdu was higher, Fuling was the second, Wulong was the lowest.Characteristic index content of flavor components in middle tobacco leaves of Qianjiang was higher, Nanchuan was the second, Wulong was the lowest. The upper and middle tobacco leaves were divided into three categories.The first category of upper tobacco leaves includes Fengdu and Nanchuan, the second category includes Wulong, Pengshui and Qianjiang, the third category is Fuling.The first category of middle tobacco leaves includes Fengdu, Nanchuan and Qianjiang, the second category includes Wulong and Fuling, and the third category includes Pengshui, with high significant differences between categories.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      范坚强,宋纪真,陈万年,等.醇化过程中烤烟片烟化学成分的变化[J].烟草科技,2003(8):19.

    2. [2]

      于建军.卷烟工艺学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.

    3. [3]

      郭俊成,程晓蕾.烤烟陈化期间理化变化对品质影响的初探[J].安徽烟草科技,1993(2):29.

    4. [4]

      朱大恒,韩锦峰,张爱萍,等.自然醇化与人工发酵对烤烟化学成分变化的影响比较研究[J].烟草科技,1999(1):3.

    5. [5]

      陈万年,宋纪真,范坚强,等.福建和云南烤烟烟片的最佳醇化期及适宜贮存时间[J].烟草科技,2003(7):9.

    6. [6]

      宋纪真,张增基,陈永龙,等.贮存条件对烤烟片烟醇化质量的影响[J].烟草科技,2003(9):6.

    7. [7]

      胡有持,牟定容,李炎强,等.云南和河南陈化的复烤片烟质量的差异[J].烟草科技,2004(9):33.

    8. [8]

      于建军,李琳,庞天河,等.烟叶发酵研究进展[J].河南农业大学学报,2006,40(1):108.

    9. [9]

      赵铭钦,王豹祥,邱立友,等.不同陈化时期烤烟叶片中酶活性及其相关化学成分分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2006,11(4):7.

    10. [10]

      卓思楚,郑湖南,齐凌峰,等.国内烤烟烟叶醇化机理及技术研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(10):91.

    11. [11]

      汪长国,李宁,寇明钰,等.复烤烟叶异地醇化过程中生物活性的变化[J].中国农业大学学报,2013,18(2):105.

    12. [12]

      王鹏,戴亚,唐杰,等.重庆地产烟叶最佳醇化期的常规化学成分分析[J].贵州农业科学,2018,46(10):37.

    13. [13]

      张允政.烤烟片烟醇化过程中化学成分变化及与醇化质量的关系研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2008.

    14. [14]

      刘登乾,李章海,毛化贤,等.陈化对不同产地烤烟品质和香气质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(22):9585.

    15. [15]

      司辉,闫铁军,张环宇,等.不同生态产区烤烟片烟化学成分在醇化中的变化规律研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(22):13328.

    16. [16]

      刘磊,王涛,史绍新,等.复烤片烟自然醇化过程中品质变化研究进展[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(8):7.

    17. [17]

      赵铭钦,赵辉,王文基,等.不同基因型烤烟化学成分和致香物质间的相关和通径分析[J].中国烟草科学,2009,30(3):7.

    18. [18]

      于建军,杨寒文,毕庆文,等.烤烟中性致香成分与香气质量的典型相关分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2009,44(2):72.

    19. [19]

      王能如,李章海,王东胜,等.烤烟香气成分与其评吸总分和香味特征的相关性[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(6):2567.

    20. [20]

      胡建军,周冀衡,李文伟,等.烤烟香味成分与其感官质量的典型相关分析[J].烟草科技,2007(3):9.

    21. [21]

      于建军,庞天河,章新军,等.鄂西南烤烟吸食质量与致香物质的关系[J].华中农业大学学报,2006,25(4):355.

    22. [22]

      于建军,庞天河,任晓红,等.烤烟中性致香物质与评吸结果关系研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2006,40(4):346.

    23. [23]

      黄静文,段焰青,杨金奎,等.烟叶主要致香成分和烟叶等级以及醇化时间的对比分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2010,32(3):440.

    24. [24]

      杨宗灿,王鹏飞,许衡,等.陈化对烟叶常规化学成分、中性致香物质含量和评吸质量的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2017,51(5):615.

    25. [25]

      张辉,赵秋红.基于主成分分析基本原理的经济指标的筛选方法[J].山东财政学院学报,2013,124(2):52.

    26. [26]

      赵丽萍,许维军.综合评价指标的选择方法及实证分析[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2002,23(2):144.

    27. [27]

      王晓鹏,曾永年,曹广超,等.基于多元统计和AHP的青藏高原牧区可持续发展评价模型与应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005(6):139.

    28. [28]

      李国栋,胡建军,周冀衡,等.基于主成分和聚类分析的烤烟化学品质综合评价[J].烟草科技,2008(12):5.

    29. [29]

      肖雅,马继良,曹凡宝,等.云南烤烟品种K326化学成分分析及聚类评价[J].西南农业学报,2012,25(1):44.

    30. [30]

      马京民,刘国顺,时向东,等.主成分分析和聚类分析在烟叶质量评价中的应用[J].烟草科技,2009(7):57.

    31. [31]

      TANG Q Y,ZHANG C X.Data processing system (DPS) software with experimental design,statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research[J].Insect Science,2013,20(2):254.

    32. [32]

      李玲燕,徐宜民,王程栋,等.贵州烟区烤烟烟叶香气物质分析[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(1):37.

    33. [33]

      周坤,周清明,胡晓兰,等.烤烟香气物质研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2008,29(2):56.

    34. [34]

      张强,董高峰,和智君,等.云南主产烟区烤烟中性致香物质含量的差异分析[J].江苏农业科学,2012,24(7):80.

    35. [35]

      刘建利,陈涛,朱晓伟,等.基于致香成分的重庆主要烟草种植区溯源特征研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(8):93.

    36. [36]

      汪耀富,高华军,刘国顺,等.不同基因型烤烟叶片致香物质含量的对比分析[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(5):117.

    37. [37]

      刘培玉,王新发,汪健,等.不同生态地区烤烟主要致香物质含量的变化[J].浙江农业学报,2010,22(2):239.

    38. [38]

      李玲燕,徐宜民,王程栋,等.贵州烟区烤烟烟叶香气物质分析[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(1):37.

    39. [39]

      左天觉,朱尊权.烟草的生产,生理和生物化学[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1993.

Article Metrics

Article views(1470) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()

Ralated
    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return