基于质构仪的烟梗回透程度定量表征方法及其应用
Quantitative characterization method of tobacco stem re-permeability based on texture analyzer and its application
-
摘要: 利用质构仪建立了烟梗回透程度定量表征方法,确定了最佳仪器测试参数,并用该方法检测了不同产地、不同规格及不同回潮参数烟梗样品的回透程度。结果表明:1)最佳测试参数中探头型号为HDP/BSK剪切型探头,探头测前、测试以及回程速度分别为5.0 mm/s、1.0 mm/s、5.0 mm/s,触发力为15 g,应变为170%;所测烟梗回透程度的日内和日间精密度分别为6.44%和4.26%,该定量表征方法精密度高、重复性好,可客观评价烟梗的回透程度。2)不同产地烟梗的回透程度存在一定的差异,河南三门峡烟梗回透程度最低,黔西南烟梗回透程度最高。3)烟梗回透程度随着烟梗长度和直径的增加呈降低趋势,随洗梗时间和洗梗水温的增加呈升高趋势,随贮梗时间的增加呈先升高后降低的趋势。4)产地、洗梗时间、水温、贮梗时间,以及产地与贮梗时间的交互作用均对烟梗的回透程度有极显著影响,产地与洗梗时间、水温的交互作用不显著。Abstract: A quantitative characterization method of tobacco stem re-permeability was established by texture analyzer, and the best instrument test parameters were determined. The method was used to characterize the degree of tobacco stem re-premeability under different regions, specifications and moisture regain parameters. The results showed that the best test parameters: the probe model was HDP/BSK shear type probe, the probe's pre-test, test and return speed was 5.0 mm/s, 1.0 mm/s, 5.0 mm/s, respectively trigger force was 15 g, and strain was 170%; the intra-day and inter-day precisions were 6.44% and 4.26%, indicating that this quantitative characterization method had high precision and good repeatability, which could objectively evaluate the degree of re-permeability of tobacco stem. There were some differences in the degree of re-permeability of tobacco stem in different regions. The degree of re-permeability of tobacco stem was lowest in Sanmenxia, He'nan, and highest in Qianxi'nan. The degree of re-permeability of tobacco stem decreased with the increase of the stem length and diameter, increased with the increase of stem washing time and water temperature, and increased first and then decreased with the increase of stem storage time. Place of origin, stem washing time, water temperature, stem storage time, and the interaction between place of origin and stem storage time had a very significant impact on the degree of tobacco stem re-permeability, but the interaction between place of origin and stem washing time and water temperature was not significant.
-
Key words:
- tobacco stem /
- degree of re-permeability /
- texture analyzer /
- moisture regain parameters
-
-
[1]
周雅宁.烟梗加工处理技术与设备研究进展[J].中国烟草学报,2019,25(2):121-129.
-
[2]
宋丽丽,魏涛,杨旭,等.烟梗结构特征及其热解特性研究[J].轻工学报,2020,35(6):27-34.
-
[3]
姚二民,周利军,李晓,等.微波膨胀烟梗技术及其应用研究进展[J].轻工学报,2017,32(3):43-50.
-
[4]
李晓,纪晓楠,姚二民,等.烟用梗丝加工工艺研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(8):182-186.
-
[5]
高辉,唐习书,王仕宏,等.烟梗预处理关键工艺参数对梗丝色差的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(2):107-110.
-
[6]
杨东亚,叶宏音,瞿先中,等.烟梗回潮工艺对梗丝物理及烟气指标影响的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(17):317-318.
-
[7]
于建军.卷烟工艺学[M].2版.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009.
-
[8]
张秋会,宋莲军,黄现青,等.质构仪在食品分析与检测中的应用[J].农产品加工,2017(24):52-56.
-
[9]
李晓,陈科冰,韩明,等.质构仪在烟叶力学特性检测中的应用进展[J].轻工学报,2021,36(3):63-69.
-
[10]
李晓,陈科冰,韩明,等.基于质构仪穿刺模式的烟叶脆性定量评价方法[J].烟草科技,2021,54(6):83-91.
-
[11]
沈进,宋成剑,胡梦岩.基于质构仪的造纸法再造烟叶柔软度评价方法[J].烟草科技,2020,53(7):87-91.
-
[12]
胡梦岩,宋成剑,李德贵,等.造纸法再造烟叶表面黏附力检测方法的建立及验证[J].烟草科技,2019,52(2):96-100.
-
[13]
林芳栋,蒋珍菊,廖珊,等.质构仪及其在食品品质评价中的应用综述[J].生命科学仪器,2009,7(5):61-63.
-
[14]
徐维华.卷烟工艺规范[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2017.
-
[15]
奚丽琴.浅谈影响切梗丝质量的主要因素[J].现代国企研究,2015(24):170.
-
[16]
戴明,李旭东,魏雅冬,等.烟梗组织结构与吸水性关系的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(4):2309-2311.
-
[17]
汤朝起,盛科,金永明,等.不同产地不同部位烤烟烟梗品质评价[C]//上海烟草学会.上海市烟草系统2011年度优秀学术论文集(工程技术类).上海:[出版社不详],2011:91-118.
-
[18]
李晓,周利军,纪晓楠,等.不同尺寸规格的烟梗吸湿特性及梗丝质量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(3):675-680.
-
[19]
祁林,王仕宏,高辉,等.烟梗尺寸对浸梗效果的影响[J].江西农业学报,2019,31(1):42-46.
-
[20]
孔祥,卢幼祥,邵名伟,等.不同类别烟梗吸湿性能分析及应用研究[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(18):101-103
, 110. -
[21]
陆国强,岳先领,陈海滨,等.洗梗水温在线初步研究[J].科技风,2017(26):204.
-
[22]
廖强,郑利锋.利用正交试验优化烟梗预处理工艺参数[J].重庆与世界,2011,28(23):128-130.
-
[1]
计量
- PDF下载量: 25
- 文章访问数: 1234
- 引证文献数: 0