植物蛋白复配对植物肉品质的影响

尹思睿; 冯娇; 杨晓宇; 李良

doi:10.12187/2024.05.003

October 2024

Article Contents

YIN Sirui, FENG Jiao, YANG Xiaoyu and et al. Influence of plant protein compounding on plant-based meat quality[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2024, 39(5): 18-28. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.003

Citation: YIN Sirui, FENG Jiao, YANG Xiaoyu and et al. Influence of plant protein compounding on plant-based meat quality[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2024, 39(5): 18-28. doi: 10.12187/2024.05.003 shu

Influence of plant protein compounding on plant-based meat quality

College of Food Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

Corresponding author: LI Liang, liliangneau@163.com
Received Date: 2023-12-30
Accepted Date: 2024-04-16
Available Online: 2024-10-15

Abstract

Soybean protein isolate (SPI), pea protein (PP) and chickpea protein (CP) were used as the main base materials, and wheat gluten (WG) was used as the auxiliary material, to study the effects of different plant protein compounds and ratios on the quality properties (sensory score, textural properties, texturization and microstructure) of plant-based meat. The results showed that the addition of WG could affect the sensory score of plant-based meat. For SPI plant-based meat, when the mass fraction of WG was 40%, the sensory score of plant-based meat was the highest ((68.68±0.85) points). For the SPI/WG system, the addition of PP increased the hardness of plant-based meat, while the addition of CP reduced the texturization of plant-based meat. For PP plant-based meat, when the mass fraction of WG was 10%, the sensory score of plant-based meat was the highest ((75.80±0.76) points). In the PP/WG system, as the SPI or CP addition increased, the tissue degree of plant-based meat decreased. For CP plant-based meat, when the mass fraction of WG was 30%, the sensory score of plant-based meat was the highest ((73.60±0.42) points). For the CP/WG system, the addition of PP or SPI could significantly reduce the hardness of plant-based meat. In the ternary protein compound plant-based meat, the PP/CP/WG (80∶10∶10) blend system had the highest sensory score ((77.30±0.57) points), hardness ((25.78±0.61) kg), and chewiness ((4.66±0.16) kg). Therefore, compounding different plant proteins was an effective method to improve the fiber structure and organization of plant-based meat. Therefore, compounding different plant proteins was an effective method to enhance the fibrous structure and texturization of plant-based meat.
- plant protein,
- plant-based meat,
- high-moisture extrusion,
- quality propertiy
References
1. [1]
  HE J,EVANS N M,LIU H Z,et al.A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives:Driving forces,history,manufacturing,and consumer attitudes[J].Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2020,19(5):2639-2656.
2. [2]
  RUBIO N R,XIANG N,KAPLAN D L.Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production[J].Nature Communications,2020,11(1):6276.
3. [3]
  GODFRAY H C J,AVEYARD P,GARNETT T,et al.Meat consumption, health, and the environment[J].Science,2018,361(6399):eaam5324.
4. [4]
  ASGAR M A,FAZILAH A,HUDA N,et al.Nonmeat protein alternatives as meat extenders and meat analogs[J].Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2010,9(5):513-529.
5. [5]
  WANG Y Q,TUCCILLO F,LAMPI A M,et al.Flavor challenges in extruded plant-based meat alternatives:A review[J].Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2022,21(3):2898-2929.
6. [6]
  ZHANG J C,CHEN Q L,KAPLAN D L,et al.High-moisture extruded protein fiber formation toward plant-based meat substitutes applications:Science,technology,and prospect[J].Trends in Food Science & Technology,2022,128:202-216.
7. [7]
  ZHANG T Y,DOU W,ZHANG X,et al.The development history and recent updates on soy protein-based meat alternatives[J].Trends in Food Science & Technology,2021,109:702-710.
8. [8]
  MERTENS C,DEHON L,BOURGEOIS A,et al.Agronomical factors influencing the legumin/vicilin ratio in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2012,92(8):1591-1596.
9. [9]
  DAVIDSSON L,DIMITRIOU T,WALCZYK T,et al.Iron absorption from experimental infant formulas based on pea (Pisum sativum)-protein isolate: The effect of phytic acid and ascorbic acid[J].The British Journal of Nutrition,2001,85(1):59-63.
10. [10]
  PENG H H,ZHANG J,WANG S H,et al.High moisture extrusion of pea protein:Effect of l-cysteine on product properties and the process forming a fibrous structure[J].Food Hydrocolloids,2022,129:107633.
11. [11]
  MENG X,THREINEN D,HANSEN M,et al.Effects of extrusion conditions on system parameters and physical properties of a chickpea flour-based snack[J].Food Research International,2010,43(2):650-658.
12. [12]
  栗俊广,张旭玥,陈宇豪,等.鹰嘴豆分离蛋白对猪肉肌原纤维蛋白乳化特性的影响[J].轻工学报,2021,36(6):30-37.
13. [13]
  WEBB D,PLATTNER B J,DONALD E,et al.Role of chickpea flour in texturization of extruded pea protein[J].Journal of Food Science,2020,85(12):4180-4187.
14. [14]
  李诚.小麦蛋白双螺杆挤压组织化工艺及机理研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2015.
15. [15]
  PIETSCH V L,KARBSTEIN H P,EMIN M A.Kinetics of wheat gluten polymerization at extrusion-like conditions relevant for the production of meat analog products[J].Food Hydrocolloids,2018,85:102-109.
16. [16]
  ZHANG X,ZHAO Y,ZHANG T Y,et al.Potential of hydrolyzed wheat protein in soy-based meat analogues:Rheological,textural and functional properties[J].Food Chemistry:X,2023,20:100921.
17. [17]
  赵玉茹,杨进洁,边文洁,等.谷朊粉对豌豆植物蛋白肉产品特性的影响[J].食品研究与开发,2024,45(2):1-6.
18. [18]
  张汆.花生蛋白挤压组织化技术及其机理研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.
19. [19]
  蒋华彬.小麦蛋白高水分挤压组织化特性研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2017.
20. [20]
  BRISHTI F H,CHAY S Y,MUHAMMAD K,et al.Texturized mung bean protein as a sustainable food source:Effects of extrusion on its physical, textural and protein quality[J].Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies,2021,67:102591.
21. [21]
  谢宇希,宋雪盈,赵谋明,等.豌豆蛋白酶解-美拉德反应产物的制备及其提升低钠植物肉风味及储藏稳定性的研究[J].现代食品科技,2024,40(1):183-193.
22. [22]
  ZHANG J C,LIU L,ZHU S,et al.Texturisation behaviour of peanut-soy bean/wheat protein mixtures during high moisture extrusion cooking[J].International Journal of Food Science & Technology,2018,53(11):2535-2541.
23. [23]
  孙志欣.高湿挤压技术生产组织化大豆蛋白工艺研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2009.
24. [24]
  莫重文.质构化蛋白及仿肉食品研制[J].郑州工程学院学报,2001,22(3):9-13.
25. [25]
  CHIANG J H,TAY W,ONG D S M,et al.Physicochemical,textural and structural characteristics of wheat gluten-soy protein composited meat analogues prepared with the mechanical elongation method[J].Food Structure,2021,28:100183.
26. [26]
  WANG H,VAN DEN BERG F W J,ZHANG W,et al.Differences in physicochemical properties of high-moisture extrudates prepared from soy and pea protein isolates[J].Food Hydrocolloids,2022,128:107540.
27. [27]
  陈树鹏,薛义博,刘大全,等.高水分挤压组织化谷朊蛋白拉伸各向异性的研究[J].河南工业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(2):48-54.
28. [28]
  CORNET S H V,VAN DER GOOT A J,VAN DER SMAN R G M.Effect of mechanical interaction on the hydration of mixed soy protein and gluten gels[J].Current Research in Food Science,2020,3:134-145.
29. [29]
  YULIARTI O,KIAT KOVIS T J,YI N J.Structuring the meat analogue by using plant-based derived composites[J].Journal of Food Engineering,2021,288:110138.
30. [30]
  高培栋,赵楠,关凯方,等.高湿挤压技术制作松粕复合素肉的工艺研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(5):258-263.
31. [31]
  岳程程,王哲,佟丽凤,等.水分添加量对高水分挤压大豆粕植物蛋白肉品质及结构特性的影响[J].食品工业科技,2023,44(22):52-60.
32. [32]
  王秋野.豌豆蛋白基植物肉的研制及特性分析[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2021.
33. [33]
  张金闯.高水分挤压过程中花生蛋白构象变化及品质调控[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2019.
Proportional views

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(610) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()

Ralated

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Influence of plant protein compounding on plant-based meat quality

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Article Metrics

Ralated

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com